0

我编写了一个 DateUtil 类,它将 java.time.LocalDateTime 转换为 java.util.Date 并向后转换。当尝试获取系统默认时区或特定时区(欧洲/柏林)时,我得到一个例外。我检查了 JVM TimeZone 是否已正确配置,确实如此。

这是我的简单代码:

import java.time.LocalDate;
import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.time.ZoneId;
import java.util.Date;

public class DateUtil {
    public static Date toDate(LocalDateTime dateTime) {
        System.out.println(System.getProperty("user.timezone"));
        ZoneId zone = ZoneId.of("Europe/Berlin");
        return Date.from(dateTime.atZone(zone).toInstant());
    }

    public static Date toDate(LocalDate date) {
        return Date.from(date.atStartOfDay(ZoneId.systemDefault()).toInstant());
    }
}

这是一个例外:

java.time.zone.ZoneRulesException: Invalid binary time-zone data: TZDB:Europe/Berlin, version: 2019c
    at java.time.zone.TzdbZoneRulesProvider.provideRules(TzdbZoneRulesProvider.java:141)
    at java.time.zone.ZoneRulesProvider.getRules(ZoneRulesProvider.java:227)
    at java.time.ZoneRegion.ofId(ZoneRegion.java:120)
    at java.time.ZoneId.of(ZoneId.java:411)
    at java.time.ZoneId.of(ZoneId.java:359)
    at de.swkbank.camunda.ks.smarta.util.DateUtil.toDate(DateUtil.java:11)
    at de.swkbank.camunda.ks.smarta.delegate.WorkingHoursCalculator.getNextDate(WorkingHoursCalculator.java:16)
    at de.swkbank.camunda.ks.smarta.delegate.WorkingHoursCalculatorTest.test(WorkingHoursCalculatorTest.java:37)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
    at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
    at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunBeforeTestExecutionCallbacks.evaluate(RunBeforeTestExecutionCallbacks.java:74)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunAfterTestExecutionCallbacks.evaluate(RunAfterTestExecutionCallbacks.java:84)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunBeforeTestMethodCallbacks.evaluate(RunBeforeTestMethodCallbacks.java:75)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunAfterTestMethodCallbacks.evaluate(RunAfterTestMethodCallbacks.java:86)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.SpringRepeat.evaluate(SpringRepeat.java:84)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:251)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:97)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunBeforeTestClassCallbacks.evaluate(RunBeforeTestClassCallbacks.java:61)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.statements.RunAfterTestClassCallbacks.evaluate(RunAfterTestClassCallbacks.java:70)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
    at org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.run(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.java:190)
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:89)
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:41)
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:542)
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:770)
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:464)
    at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:210)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
    at java.time.zone.ZoneOffsetTransition.getDateTimeAfter(ZoneOffsetTransition.java:287)
    at java.time.zone.ZoneRules.<init>(ZoneRules.java:292)
    at java.time.zone.ZoneRules.readExternal(ZoneRules.java:456)
    at java.time.zone.Ser.readInternal(Ser.java:194)
    at java.time.zone.Ser.read(Ser.java:188)
    at java.time.zone.TzdbZoneRulesProvider.provideRules(TzdbZoneRulesProvider.java:136)
    ... 40 more

我的电脑上是否有一些错误配置?它是带有 Win 10 的 Microsoft Surface。JVM 是 RedHat JDK 1.8.0.242

4

2 回答 2

2

不确定到底出了什么问题。但是在定义时区的 tzdb(时区数据库)中似乎存在问题,可能是损坏。

而且您的 tzdb 在 2019c 版本上已过时。我建议您在 JDK 中更新 tzdb,或者将整个 JDK 替换为更高版本。无论哪种方式,您都可能会看到您的错误消失了。


顺便说一句,您应该尽可能地逐步停止使用DateCalendar类。java.time类旨在完全替换遗留类在必须的地方来回转换,以与尚未更新为java.time的旧代码交互。但尽可能继续前进。那些老班真的很糟糕。

于 2021-07-05T08:17:05.437 回答
1

模拟 LocalDateTime::now 时出现问题。这导致异常。我可以通过将 java.time.Clock 注入 now-Call 并在测试中返回固定时钟来解决模拟问题。

于 2021-07-06T07:02:07.100 回答