48

我编写了一个具有 traitAnimal和实现 trait 的结构的程序Dog。它还有一个AnimalHouse将动物存储为特征对象的结构Box<Animal>

trait Animal {
    fn speak(&self);
}

struct Dog {
    name: String,
}

impl Dog {
    fn new(name: &str) -> Dog {
        return Dog {
            name: name.to_string(),
        };
    }
}

impl Animal for Dog {
    fn speak(&self) {
        println!{"{}: ruff, ruff!", self.name};
    }
}

struct AnimalHouse {
    animal: Box<Animal>,
}

fn main() {
    let house = AnimalHouse {
        animal: Box::new(Dog::new("Bobby")),
    };
    house.animal.speak();
}

它返回“鲍比:拉夫,拉夫!” 正如预期的那样,但如果我尝试克隆house编译器会返回错误:

fn main() {
    let house = AnimalHouse {
        animal: Box::new(Dog::new("Bobby")),
    };
    let house2 = house.clone();
    house2.animal.speak();
}
error[E0599]: no method named `clone` found for type `AnimalHouse` in the current scope
  --> src/main.rs:31:24
   |
23 | struct AnimalHouse {
   | ------------------ method `clone` not found for this
...
31 |     let house2 = house.clone();
   |                        ^^^^^
   |
   = help: items from traits can only be used if the trait is implemented and in scope
   = note: the following trait defines an item `clone`, perhaps you need to implement it:
           candidate #1: `std::clone::Clone`

#[derive(Clone)]我之前尝试添加struct AnimalHouse并得到另一个错误:

error[E0277]: the trait bound `Animal: std::clone::Clone` is not satisfied
  --> src/main.rs:25:5
   |
25 |     animal: Box<Animal>,
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `std::clone::Clone` is not implemented for `Animal`
   |
   = note: required because of the requirements on the impl of `std::clone::Clone` for `std::boxed::Box<Animal>`
   = note: required by `std::clone::Clone::clone`

如何使结构可AnimalHouse克隆?一般来说,积极使用特征对象是惯用的 Rust 吗?

4

4 回答 4

57

有几个问题。首先是没有什么要求 anAnimal也实现Clone。您可以通过更改特征定义来解决此问题:

trait Animal: Clone {
    /* ... */
}

这将导致Animal不再是对象安全的,这意味着Box<dyn Animal>它将变得无效,所以这不是很好。

可以做的是插入一个额外的步骤。惠特(加上@ChrisMorgan 的评论)。

trait Animal: AnimalClone {
    fn speak(&self);
}

// Splitting AnimalClone into its own trait allows us to provide a blanket
// implementation for all compatible types, without having to implement the
// rest of Animal.  In this case, we implement it for all types that have
// 'static lifetime (*i.e.* they don't contain non-'static pointers), and
// implement both Animal and Clone.  Don't ask me how the compiler resolves
// implementing AnimalClone for dyn Animal when Animal requires AnimalClone;
// I have *no* idea why this works.
trait AnimalClone {
    fn clone_box(&self) -> Box<dyn Animal>;
}

impl<T> AnimalClone for T
where
    T: 'static + Animal + Clone,
{
    fn clone_box(&self) -> Box<dyn Animal> {
        Box::new(self.clone())
    }
}

// We can now implement Clone manually by forwarding to clone_box.
impl Clone for Box<dyn Animal> {
    fn clone(&self) -> Box<dyn Animal> {
        self.clone_box()
    }
}

#[derive(Clone)]
struct Dog {
    name: String,
}

impl Dog {
    fn new(name: &str) -> Dog {
        Dog {
            name: name.to_string(),
        }
    }
}

impl Animal for Dog {
    fn speak(&self) {
        println!("{}: ruff, ruff!", self.name);
    }
}

#[derive(Clone)]
struct AnimalHouse {
    animal: Box<dyn Animal>,
}

fn main() {
    let house = AnimalHouse {
        animal: Box::new(Dog::new("Bobby")),
    };
    let house2 = house.clone();
    house2.animal.speak();
}

通过引入clone_box,我们可以解决尝试克隆 trait 对象的问题。

于 2015-05-20T15:22:20.723 回答
28

我的dyn-clone板条箱实现了DK. 答案的可重复使用版本。有了它,您只需最少的更改即可使您的原始代码工作。

  • 添加一行DynClone作为 的超特征Animal,要求每个动物实现都是可克隆的。
  • 一行生成标准库Clone的实现Box<dyn Animal>

// [dependencies]
// dyn-clone = "1.0"

use dyn_clone::{clone_trait_object, DynClone};

trait Animal: DynClone {
    fn speak(&self);
}

clone_trait_object!(Animal);

#[derive(Clone)]
struct Dog {
    name: String,
}

impl Dog {
    fn new(name: &str) -> Dog {
        Dog { name: name.to_owned() }
    }
}

impl Animal for Dog {
    fn speak(&self) {
        println!{"{}: ruff, ruff!", self.name};
    }
}

#[derive(Clone)]
struct AnimalHouse {
    animal: Box<dyn Animal>,
}

fn main() {
    let house = AnimalHouse {
        animal: Box::new(Dog::new("Bobby")),
    };
    let house2 = house.clone();
    house2.animal.speak();
}
于 2018-06-10T16:02:52.290 回答
14

一个答案正确回答了有关存储盒装特征对象的问题。

关于标题的话题,但不是关于使用特征对象的惯用方式,另一种解决方案是使用Rc智能指针而不是Box:这避免了绕过对象安全的解决方法:

#[derive(Clone)]
struct AnimalHouse {
    animal: Rc<Animal>,
}

fn main() {
    let house = AnimalHouse { animal: Rc::new(Dog::new("Bobby")) };
    let house2 = house.clone();
    house2.animal.speak();
}

Rc<T>仅用于单线程场景;还有Arc<T>

于 2018-03-27T14:28:26.660 回答
-1

我尝试使用 Dk 和 dtolnay 的解决方案,在这种情况下,我需要一个结构,其中包含一个带有框的成员(通过 tokio)。在那里我收到结构未发送和同步的错误。为了避免这种情况,可以在 Dk 克隆特征中添加发送和同步。也许这也可以添加到 dyn_clone。

于 2020-12-30T12:06:54.877 回答