我们应该为软删除使用标志,还是使用单独的连接器表?哪个更有效率?数据库是 SQL Server。
背景资料
不久前,我们有一位数据库顾问进来查看我们的数据库模式。当我们软删除一条记录时,我们将更新相应表上的 IsDeleted 标志。建议不要使用标志,将删除的记录存储在单独的表中并使用连接,因为这样会更好。我已经对这个建议进行了测试,但至少从表面上看,额外的表和连接看起来比使用标志更昂贵。
初步测试
我已经设置了这个测试。
两个表,Example 和 DeletedExample。我在 IsDeleted 列上添加了一个非聚集索引。
我做了三个测试,加载了一百万条具有以下已删除/未删除比率的记录:
- 已删除/未删除
- 50/50
- 10/90
- 1/99
结果 - 50/50
结果 - 10/90
结果 - 1/99
数据库脚本,供参考、示例、DeletedExample 和 Example.IsDeleted 的索引
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Example](
[ID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Column1] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
[IsDeleted] [bit] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Example] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Example] ADD CONSTRAINT [DF_Example_IsDeleted] DEFAULT ((0)) FOR [IsDeleted]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[DeletedExample](
[ID] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_DeletedExample] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[DeletedExample] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_DeletedExample_Example] FOREIGN KEY([ID])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Example] ([ID])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[DeletedExample] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_DeletedExample_Example]
GO
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_IsDeleted] ON [dbo].[Example]
(
[IsDeleted] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO