2

比较:

在此处输入图像描述

在第一种情况下,我find_period用相同的参数调用相同的。因为该函数是IMMUTABLE我认为它的计划将被重用(相同的函数,相同的参数,相同的计划),但似乎它没有被重用为什么?

源函数:

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "find_period" (in _start timestamptz, in _interval interval, in _target timestamptz)
 RETURNS tstzrange
 LANGUAGE sql
 IMMUTABLE RETURNS NULL ON NULL INPUT
 AS $$
    SELECT CASE
    WHEN _interval = INTERVAL '00:00:00' THEN
      tstzrange( _start, _start, '[]' )
    ELSE (
      SELECT CASE WHEN max( date ) = _target
        THEN tstzrange( max( date ) -_interval, max( date ) )
        ELSE tstzrange( max( date ), max( date ) +_interval )
      END
      FROM generate_series( _start, _target, _interval ) t (date )
    ) END
    WHERE _start < _target  OR  _interval = INTERVAL '00:00:00'
$$

并查询:

EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT find_period( 
   '2020-04-03',  
   INTERVAL '1day', 
   '9999-01-01' 
)


第一次调用带有EXPLAIN ( ANALYZE, buffers, timing )缓冲区的UPD12808第二次调用是VS 6404

db=> select version();
                                                     version                              
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 PostgreSQL 13.1 (Debian 13.1-1.pgdg100+1) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian
(1 row)

db=> EXPLAIN ( ANALYZE, buffers, timing ) SELECT find_period( 
   '2020-04-03',  
   INTERVAL '1day', 
   '9999-01-01' 
), find_period( 
db(>    '2020-04-03',  
db(>    INTERVAL '1day', 
db(>    '9999-01-01' 
db(> );
                                     QUERY PLAN                                      
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=64) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=1 loops=1)
 Planning:
   Buffers: temp read=12808 written=12808
 Planning Time: 3215.465 ms
 Execution Time: 0.023 ms
(5 rows)

db=> EXPLAIN ( ANALYZE, buffers, timing ) SELECT find_period( 
db(>    '2020-04-03',  
db(>    INTERVAL '1day', 
db(>    '9999-01-01' 
db(> );
                                     QUERY PLAN                                      
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=32) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=1)
 Planning:
   Buffers: shared hit=97, temp read=6404 written=6404
 Planning Time: 1583.670 ms
 Execution Time: 0.017 ms
(5 rows)
4

1 回答 1

2

与您所期望的不同,PostgreSQL 调用该函数两次,因为它不会花费额外的计划工作来检查您是否使用相同的常量两次调用相同的函数。

做合理的事:

SELECT x, x
FROM find_period('2020-04-03', INTERVAL '1day', '9999-01-01' ) AS f(x);
于 2021-04-23T06:44:06.523 回答