2

我刚开始使用 log4cxx，做了一个小应用程序来熟悉它。我用 Visual Studio 2005 编译，没有警告或错误。基本上看起来像：

#includes<...>
...
...
LoggerPtr logger(Logger::getLogger("MyApp"));

void main(...)
{
    //some logs here
}

它按预期工作，直到我在尝试销毁全局Logger对象时遇到异常时关闭应用程序。这是跟踪：

log4cxx.dll!apr_pool_cleanup_kill(apr_pool_t * p=0xdddddddd, const void * data=0x01cf6158, int (void *)* cleanup_fn=0x10174250)  Line 1981 + 0x3 bytes
log4cxx.dll!apr_pool_cleanup_run(apr_pool_t * p=0xdddddddd, void * data=0x01cf6158, int (void *)* cleanup_fn=0x10174250)  Line 2025
log4cxx.dll!apr_thread_mutex_destroy(apr_thread_mutex_t * mutex=0x01cf6158)  Line 133 
log4cxx.dll!log4cxx::helpers::Mutex::~Mutex()  Line 57
log4cxx.dll!log4cxx::Logger::~Logger()  Line 55 + 0xb bytes
log4cxx.dll!log4cxx::Logger::`vbase destructor'()  + 0x19 bytes
log4cxx.dll!log4cxx::Logger::`vector deleting destructor'()  + 0x5a bytes
log4cxx.dll!log4cxx::helpers::ObjectImpl::releaseRef()  Line 46 + 0x39 bytes
log4cxx.dll!log4cxx::Logger::releaseRef()  Line 63
log4cxx.dll!log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger>::~ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger>()  Line 100 + 0x33 bytes
NodeBHeartBeat.exe!`dynamic atexit destructor for 'logger''()  + 0x2b bytes
msvcr80d.dll!doexit(int code=0x00000000, int quick=0x00000000, int retcaller=0x00000001)  Line 553
msvcr80d.dll!_cexit()  Line 413 + 0xb bytes
msvcr80d.dll!__CRTDLL_INIT(void * hDllHandle=0x6c710000, unsigned long dwReason=0x00000000, void * lpreserved=0x00000001)  Line 389
msvcr80d.dll!_CRTDLL_INIT(void * hDllHandle=0x6c710000, unsigned long dwReason=0x00000000, void * lpreserved=0x00000001)  Line 214 + 0x11 bytes
ntdll.dll!774b9960()

有人知道为什么会这样吗？谢谢

4

3 回答 3

3

通过简单地将“0”分配给记录器指针，我设法解决了这个问题。

魔术技巧位于文件 src/main/include/log4cxx/helpers/objectptr.h 中的 log4cxx 源代码中

也就是说，releaseRef() 可以间接控制对象销毁顺序。

    ...
    ...
        ObjectPtrT& operator=(const int& null) //throw(IllegalArgumentException)
             {
                    //
                    //   throws IllegalArgumentException if null != 0
                    //
                    ObjectPtrBase::checkNull(null);
                    T* oldPtr = exchange(0);
                    if (oldPtr != 0) {
                       oldPtr->releaseRef();
                    }
                    return *this;
             }
...
...

因此，对于您的代码，只需在末尾添加一行：

#includes<...>
...
...
LoggerPtr logger(Logger::getLogger("MyApp"));

void main(...)
{
    //some logs here

    logger = 0; // RELEASE REFERENCE TO POINTER

   // Make sure no other reference to logger exist
   // ie: a thread that used a copy constructor on the logger object.
}
于 2015-03-18T13:55:31.360 回答
1

将 LoggerPtr 放在类中可以解决此问题，例如：

class A
{
public:
    A()
    {
           string appPath = getenv("APPDIR");
           appPath = appPath + "/" + LOG4CXX_CONFIG_FILE_NAME;

           // Load configuration file
           DOMConfigurator::configure(appPath.c_str());
           m_serviceLogger = Logger::getLogger("tuxedoService");
    }

    void log()
    {
        LOG4CXX_ERROR(m_serviceLogger, "This is a Test log");
    }

private:
    LoggerPtr m_serviceLogger;
};

A a;
int main()
{ 
   a.log();
   return 0;
}

请注意，如果您将构造函数替换为成员函数，例如init()，并在 log 函数之前调用init()main ，则会导致您再次描述的段错误。

这是一个去初始化序列问题。

于 2012-04-09T08:03:16.503 回答
0

我会在这里与我们有一个类似的案例。我们引用了一个未在我们的 log4cxx 配置文件中定义的记录器。在某些版本的库中，这很好，但在其他版本中，它会导致堆栈跟踪，如下所示：

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#1  0x00007ffff72b3892 in std::_Rb_tree<std::string, std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> >, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> > >, std::less<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> > > >::_M_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> > >*) ()
   from /usr/lib/liblog4cxx.so.10
#2  0x00007ffff72b387b in std::_Rb_tree<std::string, std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> >, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> > >, std::less<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> > > >::_M_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> > >*) ()
   from /usr/lib/liblog4cxx.so.10
#3  0x00007ffff72b387b in std::_Rb_tree<std::string, std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> >, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> > >, std::less<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> > > >::_M_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<std::string const, log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::Logger> > >*) ()
   from /usr/lib/liblog4cxx.so.10
#4  0x00007ffff72b1a2a in log4cxx::Hierarchy::~Hierarchy() () from /usr/lib/liblog4cxx.so.10
#5  0x00007ffff72b1c49 in log4cxx::Hierarchy::~Hierarchy() () from /usr/lib/liblog4cxx.so.10
#6  0x00007ffff72c982a in log4cxx::spi::DefaultRepositorySelector::~DefaultRepositorySelector() ()
   from /usr/lib/liblog4cxx.so.10
#7  0x00007ffff72c95bc in log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT<log4cxx::spi::RepositorySelector>::~ObjectPtrT() ()
   from /usr/lib/liblog4cxx.so.10
#8  0x00007ffff52e8e25 in __cxa_finalize () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#9  0x00007ffff727c2b6 in ?? () from /usr/lib/liblog4cxx.so.10
#10 0x000000000000005b in ?? ()

所以我们只需要删除引用，一切都很好。这是一个看起来非常无害的声明：

LoggerPtr logger(Logger::getLogger("someloggerthatdoesnotexist"));
于 2016-08-12T01:20:15.417 回答