在 Antlr4 中,据说支持直接左递归。我可以用下面给出的语法中的 [expr]-rule 来验证这一点。无论如何,ANTLR4 的语法分析为 [子查询] 规则抛出错误,该规则是该语法中的第二个直接递归规则:
AntlrGrammar.g4::: The following sets of rules are mutually left-recursive [subquery]
再次,子查询规则是递归的。没有间接递归。
grammar GrammarSubspace;
DIGIT: [0-9];
INT: DIGIT ( DIGIT )*;
LETTER : [a-zA-Z_] ;
ID : LETTER (LETTER|[0-9]|'_');
expr: expr '*' expr // precedence 4
| expr '+' expr // precedence 3
| INT // primary (precedence 2)
| ID // primary (precedence 1)
;
rowsetoperator: ( UNION (ALL)? | INTERSECT | MINUS );
subquery:
(
TERMINALVARIANT
| (subquery rowsetoperator subquery)+
| '(' subquery ')'
)
;
TERMINALVARIANT: T E R M I N A L V A R I A N T; // Placeholder for another UNTERMINAL that resolves into all terminals without indirect recurrence to subquery
fragment A: [aA]; fragment B: [bB]; fragment C: [cC]; fragment D: [dD];
fragment E: [eE]; fragment F: [fF]; fragment G: [gG]; fragment H: [hH];
fragment I: [iI]; fragment J: [jJ]; fragment K: [kK]; fragment L: [lL];
fragment M: [mM]; fragment N: [nN]; fragment O: [oO]; fragment P: [pP];
fragment Q: [qQ]; fragment R: [rR]; fragment S: [sS]; fragment T: [tT];
fragment U: [uU]; fragment V: [vV]; fragment W: [wW]; fragment X: [xX];
fragment Y: [yY]; fragment Z: [zZ];
不同子查询代码的合法语法输入行将是:
TERMINALVARIANT
(TERMINALVARIANT)
TERMINALVARIANT INTERSECT TERMINALVARIANT
TERMINALVARIANT UNION ALL TERMINALVARIANT
TERMINALVARIANT UNION TERMINALVARIANT
TERMINALVARIANT MINUS TERMINALVARIANT
(TERMINALVARIANT INTERSECT TERMINALVARIANT)
(((((TERMINALVARIANT INTERSECT TERMINALVARIANT)))))
等等
递归具有 TERMINALVARIANT 给出退出子句,因此递归是/可以是有限的。为什么我会收到此错误?如何重写语法以避免它?