但是这个就完全不一样了!如果我注释掉该std::flush
行,则会发生 Segfault,但如果我添加此行,则不会发生分段错误!
int Stm32Serial::writeToSerial()
{
/// TODO Write handle for writing if necessary
/// int serial_write_ret;
if ( USE_USB )
{
usb_port.writeBytes ( stm_buf_t, stm_buf_t[LENGTH_INDEX] );
return SERIAL_RET;
}
else
{
std::cout << std::flush; // TODO HACK Remove it!
serial_port.sendBuff ( stm_buf_t, stm_buf_t[LENGTH_INDEX] );
return SERIAL_RET;
}
}
我也试过gdb
;我在ROS中使用此函数和此调试技术并使用 -g 选项进行编译,但它不打印函数名称
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
__mempcpy_sse2 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/memcpy.S:142
142 ../sysdeps/x86_64/memcpy.S: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0 __mempcpy_sse2 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/memcpy.S:142
#1 0x6564656563786520 in ?? ()
#2 0x20726f7272652064 in ?? ()
#3 0x6c6f687365726874 in ?? ()
#4 0x2e30203a79622064 in ?? ()
#5 0x202c323537373431 in ?? ()
#6 0x697420656c637963 in ?? ()
#7 0x36312e30203a656d in ?? ()
#8 0x2c31343936373632 in ?? ()
#9 0x6f68736572687420 in ?? ()
#10 0x32302e30203a646c in ?? ()
#11 0x742064616572202c in ?? ()
#12 0x312e30203a656d69 in ?? ()
#13 0x3530333430353233 in ?? ()
#14 0x657461647075202c in ?? ()
#15 0x30203a656d697420 in ?? ()
#16 0x373430353233312e in ?? ()
#17 0x74697277202c3234 in ?? ()
#18 0x203a656d69742065 in ?? ()
#19 0x3637363236312e30 in ?? ()
#20 0x006d305b1b333637 in ?? ()
#21 0x00007fffffffbbf0 in ?? ()
#22 0x00000000ffffbbd8 in ?? ()
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#23 0x00007fff00000000 in ?? ()
#24 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
- 找了
LENGTH_INDEX
,stm_buf_t[]
有ok。
并且; 如果我std::cout << std::flush;
从另一个地方调用这个函数,它也会处理 Segfault!
...
genSum ( stm_buf_t );
writeToSerial();
std::cout << std::flush;
...
我的下一个方法是什么?