0

我正在尝试使用 BNFC 编写编译器。我将使用 BNFC 生成抽象语法树。但是我遇到了错误，我似乎无法弄清楚为什么。似乎没有太多关于它的文档。

以下是我得到的错误：

Bad coercion in rule _. Prog ::= Block
Bad coercion in rule _. Declarations ::= Declaration ";" Declarations
Bad coercion in rule _. Declarations ::=
Bad coercion in rule _. Declaration ::= Var_declaration
Bad coercion in rule _. Declaration ::= Fun_declaration
Bad coercion in rule _. Type ::= "int"
Bad coercion in rule _. Type ::= "real"
Bad coercion in rule _. Type ::= "bool"
Bad coercion in rule _. Array_dimensions ::= "[" Expr "]" Array_dimensions
Bad coercion in rule _. Array_dimensions ::=
Bad coercion in rule _. Fun_block ::= Declarations Fun_body
Bad coercion in rule _. Param_list ::= "(" Parameters ")"
Bad coercion in rule _. Parameters ::= Basic_declaration More_parameters
Bad coercion in rule _. Parameters ::=
Bad coercion in rule _. More_parameters ::= "," Basic_declaration More_parameters
Bad coercion in rule _. More_parameters ::=
Bad coercion in rule _. Basic_declaration ::= Ident Basic_array_dimensions ":" Type
Bad coercion in rule _. Basic_array_dimensions ::=
Bad coercion in rule _. Program_body ::= "begin" Prog_stmts "end"
Bad coercion in rule _. Fun_body ::= "begin" Prog_stmts "return" Expr ";" "end"
Bad coercion in rule _. Prog_stmts ::= Prog_stmt ";" Prog_stmts
Bad coercion in rule _. Prog_stmts ::=
Bad coercion in rule _. Identifier ::= Ident Array_dimensions
Bad coercion in rule _. Expr ::= Bint_term
Bad coercion in rule _. Bint_term ::= Bint_factor
Bad coercion in rule _. Bint_factor ::= Int_expr Compare_op Int_expr
Bad coercion in rule _. Bint_factor ::= Int_expr
Bad coercion in rule _. Int_expr ::= Int_expr Addop Int_term
Bad coercion in rule _. Int_expr ::= Int_term
Bad coercion in rule _. Int_term ::= Int_term Mulop Int_factor
Bad coercion in rule _. Int_term ::= Int_factor
Bad coercion in rule _. Int_factor ::= "(" Expr ")"
Bad coercion in rule _. Modifier_list ::= "(" Arguments ")"
Bad coercion in rule _. Modifier_list ::= Array_dimensions
Bad coercion in rule _. Arguments ::= Expr More_arguments
Bad coercion in rule _. Arguments ::=
Bad coercion in rule _. More_arguments ::= "," Expr More_arguments
Bad coercion in rule _. More_arguments ::=

这是 BNFC 文件的示例：

_.Prog ::= Block;

M_Prog. Block ::= Declarations Program_body;

_.Declarations ::= Declaration ";" Declarations;
_. Declarations ::= ;

_. Declaration ::= Var_declaration;
_. Declaration ::= Fun_declaration;

M_Var. Var_declaration ::= "var" Ident Array_dimensions ":" Type;

_. Type ::= "int";
_. Type ::= "real";
_. Type ::= "bool"; 

_. Array_dimensions ::= "[" Expr "]" Array_dimensions;
_. Array_dimensions ::=;

M_Fun. Fun_declaration ::= "fun" Ident Param_list ":" Type "{" Fun_block "}";

_. Fun_block ::= Declarations Fun_body; 

_. Param_list ::= "(" Parameters ")";

_. Parameters ::= Basic_declaration More_parameters;
_. Parameters ::= ;

_. More_parameters ::= ","  Basic_declaration More_parameters;
_. More_parameters ::= ;

_. Basic_declaration ::= Ident Basic_array_dimensions ":" Type;

_. Basic_array_dimensions ::= "[" "]" Basic_array_dimensions;
_. Basic_array_dimensions ::=;

似乎是我_.错误地使用了标签。但是该手册只有一两行描述它的用途。我在这里做错了什么？

4

1 回答 1

1

从文档中：

当然，下划线仅在替换值类型与参数类型相同的单参数构造函数时才有意义。

这意味着只有_在规则右侧恰好有一个非终端并且该非终端与左侧站点上的非终端相同时才能使用。所以你可以做类似_. A ::= "(" A ")" ; 但不是_. A ::= "(" B ")" ;nor的事情_. A ::= "(" A A ")" ;。

在您的示例中，我建议您为每条规则打一个标签，_主要用于在某些极端情况下简化 AST。

顺便说一句，还有一个事物列表的语法快捷方式。

于 2016-03-28T19:03:29.113 回答