我目前使用 Hmisc 汇总方法进行配对 Wilcoxon 测试的努力:
conTestWP <-
function (group, x)
{
st <- wilcox.test( x[as.numeric(group)==1], x[as.numeric(group)==2], paired=TRUE)
list(P = st["p.value"], stat = st["statistic"], df = st[c("df1", "df2")],
testname = "Wilcoxon-paired",
statname = "V", latexstat = "V", plotmathstat = "F[df]")}
summaryM 方法会拆分其分组变量,因此不适用于配对测试。这summary.formula
组方法确实允许“反向”方法,其中连续变量位于公式的 RHS 上:
f <- summary.formula(treatment ~ sbp, data=dat, method="reverse",
test=TRUE,conTest=conTestWP)
尝试打印f
会引发错误(错误地声称 p 值不是数字),但您可以查看内部以查看配对wilcox.test
结果已传递到对象中,并且与您“手动”完成它们的结果相同:
str(f) # but did snip some of the output:
$ testresults:List of 1
..$ sbp:List of 7
.. ..$ P :List of 1
.. .. ..$ p.value: num 0.589
.. ..$ stat :List of 1
.. .. ..$ NA: NULL
.. ..$ df :List of 2
.. .. ..$ NA: NULL
.. .. ..$ NA: NULL
.. ..$ testname : chr "Wilcoxon-paired"
.. ..$ statname : chr "V"
.. ..$ latexstat : chr "V"
.. ..$ plotmathstat: chr "F[df]"
通过为“df”值输入硬编码数字来修复引发的错误的努力失败了。我没有成功跟踪我仅粘贴在顶部的回溯:
> f
Error in log10(ifelse(pv > 0, pv, 1e-50)) :
non-numeric argument to mathematical function
> traceback()
5: format.pval(pval, digits = pdig, eps = eps)
4: formatTestStats(tr, prtest = prtest, latex = latex, testUsed = testUsed,
pdig = pdig, eps = eps, footnoteTest = footnoteTest)
3: formatCons(stats[[i]], nam, tr, x$group.freq, prmsd, sep, formatArgs,
round, prtest, pdig = pdig, eps = eps)
2: print.summary.formula.reverse(list(stats = list(sbp = c(97.9191028465814,
94.9839938500064, 100.014783572809, 97.2881910017715, 107.288034416825,
105.746587052709, 111.864782483651, 112.689945667021, 116.229748640414,
115.604190135259, 119.743427097173, 119.276780441804, 123.380695706571,
122.111672516175, 128.138778071723, 126.592782661592, 133.726823015259,
132.141219449201, 140.847941698775, 136.762891898923, 145.175812916341,
141.635692905295, 120.013464038065, 118.994407752318, 12.1494617994813,
11.9252958974706)), type = 2, group.name = "treatment", group.label = "treatment",