0

我可以很好地安装berkshelf：

$ gem install berkshelf                                                                     
Successfully installed berkshelf-3.2.0
Parsing documentation for berkshelf-3.2.0
Done installing documentation for berkshelf after 1 seconds
1 gem installed

但它并没有真正影响我的行为： 

$ berks version
Berkshelf (2.0.18)

这看起来很正常：

$ which berks
/home/rubyUser/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.4/bin/berks

我在 debian stable (wheezy) 上使用 ruby​​ 2.1.4：

$ rvm list

rvm rubies

   ruby-1.9.3-p550 [ x86_64 ]
=* ruby-2.1.4 [ x86_64 ]

我认为我的路径是正确的：

$ echo $PATH
/home/rubyUser/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.4/bin:/home/rubyUser/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.4@global/bin:/home/rubyUser/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.1.4/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/home/rubyUser/.rvm/bin:/home/rubyUser/.rvm/bin

chefdk 可能会以某种方式干扰：

$ whereis berks
berks: /usr/bin/berks /usr/bin/X11/berks /opt/chefdk/bin/berk

但是提供调用 berks 的完整路径不会影响版本。查看提供的berkswhich表明它只是从其他地方调用宝石，我如何追查它的来源？

$ cat `which berks`
#!/usr/bin/env ruby_executable_hooks
#
# This file was generated by RubyGems.
#
# The application 'berkshelf' is installed as part of a gem, and
# this file is here to facilitate running it.
#

require 'rubygems'

version = ">= 0"

if ARGV.first
  str = ARGV.first
  str = str.dup.force_encoding("BINARY") if str.respond_to? :force_encoding
  if str =~ /\A_(.*)_\z/ and Gem::Version.correct?($1) then
    version = $1
    ARGV.shift
  end
end

gem 'berkshelf', version
load Gem.bin_path('berkshelf', 'berks', version)
4

1 回答 1

0

我在我所在的目录中有一个错误的 Gemfile.lock。它将 berkshelf 锁定到 2.0 版本。

对我的问题的一个更深入的答案是获得一个适当的 Rakefile 来在必要时正确清理这些东西

于 2014-11-08T16:19:40.663 回答