0

我想到了下面的解决方案，因为集合非常小。但如果它很大呢？ 

private Dictionary<string, OfTable> _folderData = new Dictionary<string, OfTable>();

public Dictionary<string, OfTable> FolderData
{
    get { return new Dictionary<string,OfTable>(_folderData); }
}

使用列表，您可以：

public class MyClass
{
    private List<int> _items = new List<int>();

    public IList<int> Items
    {
        get { return _items.AsReadOnly(); }
    }
}

那样就好了！

在此先感谢，干杯和BR-马蒂

现在，当我认为收藏中的对象在堆中时。所以我的解决方案不会阻止调用者修改它们！！！CAUSE BOTH Dictionary 都包含对相同对象的引用。这是否适用于上面的示例？

class OfTable
{
    private int _table;
    private List<int> _classes;
    private string _label;

    public OfTable()
    {
        _classes = new List<int>();
    }

    public int Table
    {
        get { return _table; }
        set { _table = value; }
    }

    public List<int> Classes
    {
        get { return _classes; }
        set { _classes = value; }
    }

    public string Label
    {
        get { return _label; }
        set { _label = value; }
    }
}

那么如何使这个不可变？

4

2 回答 2

4

推出自己的ReadOnlyDictionary<K,V>包装类并不难。像这样的东西：

public sealed class ReadOnlyDictionary<TKey, TValue> : IDictionary<TKey, TValue>
{
    private readonly IDictionary<TKey, TValue> _dictionary;

    public ReadOnlyDictionary(IDictionary<TKey, TValue> dictionary)
    {
        if (dictionary == null)
            throw new ArgumentNullException("dictionary");

        _dictionary = dictionary;
    }

    public bool ContainsKey(TKey key)
    {
        return _dictionary.ContainsKey(key);
    }

    public int Count
    {
        get { return _dictionary.Count; }
    }

    public IEnumerator<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>> GetEnumerator()
    {
        return _dictionary.GetEnumerator();
    }

    public ICollection<TKey> Keys
    {
        get { return _dictionary.Keys; }
    }

    public bool TryGetValue(TKey key, out TValue value)
    {
        return _dictionary.TryGetValue(key, out value);
    }

    public ICollection<TValue> Values
    {
        get { return _dictionary.Values; }
    }

    public TValue this[TKey key]    // Item
    {
        get { return _dictionary[key]; }
    }

    #region IDictionary<TKey, TValue> Explicit Interface Implementation

    void IDictionary<TKey, TValue>.Add(TKey key, TValue value)
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException("Dictionary is read-only.");
    }

    bool IDictionary<TKey, TValue>.Remove(TKey key)
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException("Dictionary is read-only.");
    }

    TValue IDictionary<TKey, TValue>.this[TKey key]    // Item
    {
        get { return _dictionary[key]; }
        set { throw new NotSupportedException("Dictionary is read-only."); }
    }

    #endregion

    #region ICollection<T> Explicit Interface Implementation

    void ICollection<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>.Add(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> item)
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException("Collection is read-only.");
    }

    void ICollection<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>.Clear()
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException("Collection is read-only.");
    }

    bool ICollection<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>.Contains(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> item)
    {
        return _dictionary.Contains(item);
    }

    void ICollection<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>.CopyTo(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>[] array, int arrayIndex)
    {
        _dictionary.CopyTo(array, arrayIndex);
    }

    bool ICollection<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>.IsReadOnly
    {
        get { return true; }
    }

    bool ICollection<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>.Remove(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> item)
    {
        throw new NotSupportedException("Collection is read-only.");
    }

    #endregion

    #region IEnumerable Explicit Interface Implementation

    IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
    {
        return ((IEnumerable)_dictionary).GetEnumerator();
    }

    #endregion
}

如果您使用的是 C#3 或更高版本，那么您也可以使用匹配的AsReadOnly扩展方法：

public static class ReadOnlyDictionaryHelper
{
    public static ReadOnlyDictionary<TKey, TValue> AsReadOnly<TKey, TValue>(this IDictionary<TKey, TValue> dictionary)
    {
        var temp = dictionary as ReadOnlyDictionary<TKey, TValue>;
        return temp ?? new ReadOnlyDictionary<TKey, TValue>(dictionary);
    }
}

然后从您的属性中返回只读包装器：

// in C#2
return new ReadOnlyDictionary<string, OfTable>(_folderData);

// in C#3 or later
return _folderData.AsReadOnly();
于 2010-04-07T09:55:53.827 回答
1

使用ReadOnlyCollection<T>类。

ReadOnlyCollection 泛型类的实例始终是只读的。只读集合只是一个带有防止修改集合的包装器的集合；因此，如果对基础集合进行了更改，则只读集合会反映这些更改。有关此类的可修改版本，请参见 Collection。

- 编辑 -

在这里查看一个简单的字典包装器。和理查德卡尔的通用只读字典。

于 2010-04-07T09:53:55.613 回答