似乎 3.6375861597263857 是最大值lch_similarity
(我无法获得 3.6889 ...)。lch_similarity
,根据文档具有以下属性:
Leacock Chodorow Similarity:
Return a score denoting how similar two word senses are, based on the
shortest path that connects the senses (as above) and the maximum depth
of the taxonomy in which the senses occur. The relationship is given as
-log(p/2d) where p is the shortest path length and d is the taxonomy
depth.
...
:return: A score denoting the similarity of the two ``Synset`` objects,
normally greater than 0. None is returned if no connecting path
could be found. If a ``Synset`` is compared with itself, the
maximum score is returned, which varies depending on the taxonomy
depth.
鉴于它rock_hind.n.01
处于 WordNet 分类中的最深层次 (19) 和change.n.06
最浅层次 (2),我们可以尝试不同的深度:
>>> from nltk.corpus import wordnet as wn
>>> rock = wn.synset('rock_hind.n.01')
>>> change = wn.synset('change.n.06')
>>> rock.lch_similarity(rock)
3.6375861597263857
>>> change.lch_similarity(change)
3.6375861597263857
>>> change.lch_similarity(rock)
0.7472144018302211
>>> rock.lch_similarity(change)
0.7472144018302211
可以对其他措施进行类似的实验,其中范围似乎相当大:
>>> from nltk.corpus import wordnet_ic, genesis
>>> brown_ic = wordnet_ic.ic('ic-brown.dat')
>>> semcor_ic = wordnet_ic.ic('ic-semcor.dat')
>>> genesis_ic = wn.ic(genesis, False, 0.0)
>>> rock.res_similarity(rock, brown_ic) # res_similarity, brown
1e+300
>>> rock.res_similarity(change, brown_ic)
-0.0
>>> rock.res_similarity(rock, semcor_ic) # res_similarity, semcor
1e+300
>>> rock.res_similarity(change, semcor_ic)
-0.0
>>> rock.res_similarity(rock, genesis_ic) # res_similarity, genesis
1e+300
>>> rock.res_similarity(change, genesis_ic)
-0.08306855877006339
>>> change.res_similarity(rock, genesis_ic)
-0.08306855877006339
>>> rock.jcn_similarity(rock, brown_ic) # jcn, brown - results are identical with semcor and genesis
1e+300
>>> rock.jcn_similarity(change, brown_ic)
1e-300
>>> change.jcn_similarity(rock, brown_ic)
1e-300