这与所有现有的 DbModelBuilder 扩展方法兼容,因为它只是在顶部添加了一个流畅的层,但它确实带来了一些语法开销。不完全符合您的要求,但不涉及使用支持代码。尚未对此进行全面测试,但如果您对语法感到满意,它应该可以工作:
// First option - like this better because it has less cruft than multiple Has invocations
var modelBuilder = new DbModelBuilder();
var modelConfiguration = new ModelConfigurator(modelBuilder);
modelConfiguration.Entity<Product>().Has(e => {
e.Property(en => en.Name).IsRequired();
e.Property(en => en.UPC).IsRequired();
e.Property(en => en.Price).IsRequired();
e.Property(en => en.Description).IsRequired();}
);
或者
var modelBuilder = new DbModelBuilder();
var modelConfiguration = new ModelConfigurator(modelBuilder);
modelConfiguration.Entity<Product>().Has(e => e.Property(en => en.Name).IsRequired())
.Has(e => e.Property(en => en.UPC).IsRequired())
.Has(e => e.Property(en => en.Price).IsRequired())
.Has(e => e.Property(en => en.Description).IsRequired());
// continue configuring properties, and creating methods on ModelConfigurator as needed
支持代码:
public class Product{
public string Name {get;set;}
public double Price {get;set;}
public string UPC {get;set;}
public string Description {get;set;}
}
public class ModelConfigurator{
public DbModelBuilder ModelBuilder{get;set;}
public ModelConfigurator(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder){
ModelBuilder = modelBuilder;
}
public EntityConfigurator<TEntity> Entity<TEntity>() where TEntity : class {
var entity = ModelBuilder.Entity<TEntity>();
return new EntityConfigurator<TEntity>(entity);
}
}
public class EntityConfigurator<TEntity> where TEntity : class{
public EntityTypeConfiguration<TEntity> EntityTypeConfiguration {get;set;}
public EntityConfigurator(EntityTypeConfiguration<TEntity> entityTypeConfiguration){
EntityTypeConfiguration = entityTypeConfiguration;
}
public EntityConfigurator<TEntity> Has(Action<EntityTypeConfiguration<TEntity>> a){
a(this.EntityTypeConfiguration);
return this;
}
}