1

根据C99 标准6.5.2.5 .9 代码：

int *p = (int []){2, 4};

将 p 初始化为指向两个整数数组的第一个元素，第一个元素的值为 2，第二个元素的值为 4。此复合文字中的表达式必须是常量。未命名对象具有静态存储持续时间。

但是当我们做这样的事情时会发生什么：

int* arr[100];
for (int a=0; a<100; a++) {
  arr[a] = (int []){2, 4};
}

循环的每次迭代都是新unnamed object创建的，还是每次迭代都使用相同的对象？

如果我们这样做，结果会不会有所不同：

int* ptr = NULL;
for (int a=0; a<100; a++) {
  ptr = (int []){2, 4};
}

两种可能的选择是：每次循环迭代时创建一个新对象，或者每次循环迭代都使用相同的对象。

我感兴趣的是，这种情况下的行为是否可以从标准中的内容中扣除，还是由编译器决定。

我已经使用以下代码在 gcc 4.1.2 下对其进行了测试：

int main(void) {
  int* arr[100];
  for (int a=0; a<10; a++) {
      arr[a] = (int []){2, 4};
      printf("%p ", arr[a]);
  }
  printf("\n");
}

结果是：

0x7fff4c0010a0 0x7fff4c0010a0 0x7fff4c0010a0 0x7fff4c0010a0 0x7fff4c0010a0 0x7fff4c0010a0 0x7fff4c0010a0 0x7fff4c0010a0 0x7fff4c001010a0x07f4

我写了一些代码来检查caf的答案：

void fillArr(int* arr[]) {
  for (int a=0; a<4; a++) {
    arr[a] = (int []){a, a};
    printf("%p %d |  ", arr[a], arr[a][0]);
  }
}

void fillArr2(int* arr[]) {
  for (int a=0; a<4; a++) {
    int temp[] = { a, a };
    arr[a] = temp;
    printf("%p %d |  ", arr[a], arr[a][0]);
  }
}


int main(void) {
  int* arr[4];
  printf("\nfillarr1 function scope\n");
  fillArr(arr);


  printf("\nfillArr main scope\n");
  for (int a=0; a<4; a++) {
    printf("%p %d | ", arr[a], arr[a][0]);
  }

  printf("\nfillArr2 function scope\n");
  fillArr2(arr);

  printf("\nfillArr2 main scope\n");
  for (int a=0; a<4; a++) {
    printf("%p %d | ", arr[a], arr[a][0]);
  }

  printf("\n");
}

结果是（用 valgrind 调用它来检测内存错误）：

==19110== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==19110== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==19110== Using Valgrind-3.5.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==19110== Command: ./a.out
==19110==

fillarr1 function scope
0x7ff000830 0 |  0x7ff000830 1 |  0x7ff000830 2 |  0x7ff000830 3 |
fillArr main scope
==19110== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==19110==    at 0x3E33A41B1D: _itoa_word (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A44F44: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x400664: main (literalstest.c:26)
==19110==
==19110== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==19110==    at 0x3E33A41B27: _itoa_word (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A44F44: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x400664: main (literalstest.c:26)
==19110==
==19110== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==19110==    at 0x3E33A44FBE: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x400664: main (literalstest.c:26)
==19110==
==19110== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==19110==    at 0x3E33A4574A: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x400664: main (literalstest.c:26)
==19110==
==19110== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==19110==    at 0x3E33A43C49: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x400664: main (literalstest.c:26)
==19110==
0x7ff000830 864144320 | 0x7ff000830 864144320 | 0x7ff000830 864144320 | 0x7ff000830 864144320 |
fillArr2 function scope
0x7ff000830 0 |  0x7ff000830 1 |  0x7ff000830 2 |  0x7ff000830 3 |
fillArr2 main scope
==19110== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==19110==    at 0x3E33A41B1D: _itoa_word (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A44F44: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x4006B9: main (literalstest.c:34)
==19110==
==19110== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==19110==    at 0x3E33A41B27: _itoa_word (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A44F44: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x4006B9: main (literalstest.c:34)
==19110==
==19110== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==19110==    at 0x3E33A44FBE: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x4006B9: main (literalstest.c:34)
==19110==
==19110== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==19110==    at 0x3E33A4574A: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x4006B9: main (literalstest.c:34)
==19110==
==19110== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==19110==    at 0x3E33A43C49: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x3E33A4CAF9: printf (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so)
==19110==    by 0x4006B9: main (literalstest.c:34)
==19110==
0x7ff000830 864144320 | 0x7ff000830 864144320 | 0x7ff000830 864144320 | 0x7ff000830 864144320 |
==19110==
==19110== HEAP SUMMARY:
==19110==     in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==19110==   total heap usage: 0 allocs, 0 frees, 0 bytes allocated
==19110==

因此，文字仅在声明它们的函数内可用，离开函数后超出范围，之后访问它们是未定义的行为。

4

1 回答 1

2

你误读了标准。您给出的示例以“文件范围定义... ”开头，但您的代码不能出现在文件范围内。

§6.5.2.5 p6 说，如果复合文字出现在函数体内，

...它具有与封闭块相关的自动存储持续时间。

所以，没有歧义。在这种情况下，复合文字具有自动存储持续时间，持续到包含它的循环块结束 - 从概念上讲，为循环的每次迭代创建和销毁一个新的复合文字，但由于这些文字的生命周期不会重叠时，实现可能会重复使用相同的空间。你写的和这个没有什么不同：

int *arr[100];
for (int a=0; a<100; a++) {
  int temp[] = { 2, 4 };
  arr[a] = temp;
}

...只是在复合文字情况下，数组未命名。寿命是一样的。

于 2013-06-11T13:11:28.410 回答