4

想象一下有一个主类——模拟器——它使用另外两个类——生产者评估者,它们分别实现接口 IProducer 和 IEvaluator。

IProducer 实现产生结果,而 IEvaluator 实现评估这些结果。模拟器通过查询 IProducer 实现然后将结果传送到 IEvaluator 实例来控制执行流程。

Producer 和 Evaluator 的实际实现在运行时是已知的,在编译时我只知道它们的接口。检查下面的示例。

package com.test;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;

/**
 * Producers produce results. I do not care what their actual type is, but the
 * values in the map have to be comparable amongst themselves.
 */
interface IProducer<T extends Comparable<T>> {
    public Map<Integer, T> getResults();
}

/**
 * This example implementation ranks items in the map by using Strings.
 */
class ProducerA implements IProducer<String> {
    @Override
    public Map<Integer, String> getResults() {
        Map<Integer, String> result = new HashMap<Integer, String>();
        result.put(1, "A");
        result.put(2, "B");
        result.put(3, "B");

        return result;
    }
}

/**
 * This example implementation ranks items in the map by using integers.
 */
class ProducerB implements IProducer<Integer> {
    @Override
    public Map<Integer, Integer> getResults() {
        Map<Integer, Integer> result = new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
        result.put(1, 10);
        result.put(2, 30);
        result.put(3, 30);

        return result;
    }
}

/**
 * Evaluator evaluates the results against the given groundTruth. All it needs
 * to know about results, is that they are comparable amongst themselves.
 */
interface IEvaluator {
    public <T extends Comparable<T>> double evaluate(Map<Integer, T> results,
            Map<Integer, Double> groundTruth);
}

/**
 * This is example of an evaluator, metric Kendall Tau-B. Don't bother with
 * semantics, all that matters is that I want to be able to call
 * r1.compareTo(r2) for every (r1, r2) that appear in Map<Integer, T> results.
 */
class KendallTauB implements IEvaluator {
    @Override
    public <T extends Comparable<T>> double evaluate(Map<Integer, T> results,
            Map<Integer, Double> groundTruth) {
        int concordant = 0, discordant = 0, tiedRanks = 0, tiedCapabilities = 0;

        for (Entry<Integer, T> rank1 : results.entrySet()) {
            for (Entry<Integer, T> rank2 : results.entrySet()) {
                if (rank1.getKey() < rank2.getKey()) {
                    final T r1 = rank1.getValue();
                    final T r2 = rank2.getValue();
                    final Double c1 = groundTruth.get(rank1.getKey());
                    final Double c2 = groundTruth.get(rank2.getKey());

                    final int ranksDiff = r1.compareTo(r2);
                    final int actualDiff = c1.compareTo(c2);

                    if (ranksDiff * actualDiff > 0) {
                        concordant++;
                    } else if (ranksDiff * actualDiff < 0) {
                        discordant++;
                    } else {
                        if (ranksDiff == 0)
                            tiedRanks++;

                        if (actualDiff == 0)
                            tiedCapabilities++;
                    }
                }
            }
        }

        final double n = results.size() * (results.size() - 1d) / 2d;

        return (concordant - discordant)
                / Math.sqrt((n - tiedRanks) * (n - tiedCapabilities));
    }
}

/**
 * The simulator class that queries the producer and them conveys results to the
 * evaluator.
 */
public class Simulator {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        // example of a ground truth
        Map<Integer, Double> groundTruth = new HashMap<Integer, Double>();
        groundTruth.put(1, 1d);
        groundTruth.put(2, 2d);
        groundTruth.put(3, 3d);

        // dynamically load producers
        List<IProducer<?>> producerImplementations = lookUpProducers();

        // dynamically load evaluators
        List<IEvaluator> evaluatorImplementations = lookUpEvaluators();

        // pick a producer
        IProducer<?> producer = producerImplementations.get(0);

        // pick an evaluator
        IEvaluator evaluator = evaluatorImplementations.get(0);

        // evaluate the result against the ground truth
        double score = evaluator.evaluate(producer.getResults(), groundTruth);

        System.out.printf("Score is %.2f\n", score);
    }

    // Methods below are for demonstration purposes only. I'm actually using
    // ServiceLoader.load(Clazz) to dynamically discover and load classes that
    // implement interfaces IProducer and IEvaluator
    public static List<IProducer<?>> lookUpProducers() {
        List<IProducer<?>> producers = new ArrayList<IProducer<?>>();
        producers.add(new ProducerA());
        producers.add(new ProducerB());

        return producers;
    }

    public static List<IEvaluator> lookUpEvaluators() {
        List<IEvaluator> evaluators = new ArrayList<IEvaluator>();
        evaluators.add(new KendallTauB());

        return evaluators;
    }
}

此代码在没有警告的情况下编译,并且也按应有的方式运行。这是我之前提出的问题的解决方案,所以这是一个后续问题。

使用上面的代码,假设您想将 producer.getResults() 调用的结果存储在一个变量中(稍后将在对 evaluator.evaluate(results, groundTruth) 调用的调用中使用该变量)。该变量的类型是什么?

地图<整数, ?>, 地图<整数, ? 扩展 Comparable<?>>? 使main方法泛型并使用泛型类型?到目前为止,我尝试过的任何方法都不起作用。编译器会抱怨我提出的每种类型。

public static void main(String[] args) {
    // example of a ground truth
    Map<Integer, Double> groundTruth = new HashMap<Integer, Double>();
    groundTruth.put(1, 1d);
    groundTruth.put(2, 2d);
    groundTruth.put(3, 3d);

    // dynamically load producers
    List<IProducer<?>> producerImplementations = lookUpProducers();

    // dynamically load evaluators
    List<IEvaluator> evaluatorImplementations = lookUpEvaluators();

    // pick a producer
    IProducer<?> producer = producerImplementations.get(0);

    // pick an evaluator
    IEvaluator evaluator = evaluatorImplementations.get(0);

    // evaluate the result against the ground truth
    Map<Integer, ?> data = producer.getResults(); // this type works
    double score = evaluator.evaluate(data, groundTruth); // but now this call does not


    System.out.printf("Score is %.2f\n", score);
}

似乎 producer.getResults() 返回的东西不能用 Java 静态表达。这是一个错误,还是我错过了什么?

4

2 回答 2

2

在我回答之前的一个注释:你的所有T extends Comparable<T>陈述都应该是T extends Comparable<? super T>,它允许更大的灵活性(你为什么要关心它是否比较Ts 或Objects?),并且它是我的解决方案工作所必需的。

这并不是 Java 类型系统的真正“错误”,它只是给它带来了不便。Java 并不特别喜欢将交集类型作为类型声明的一部分。

我发现解决这个问题的一种方法是创建一个在正常情况下不应该使用的“不安全”方法:

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> Map<Integer, T> cast(Map<Integer, ?> map) {
    return (Map<Integer, T>) map;
}

只需确保使用Map实际上是 a 的a 调用此方法Map<Integer, T extends Comparable<? super T>>(就像 oneIProducer的返回值一样)。

使用此方法,您可以执行以下操作:

IProducer<?> producer = ...
IEvaluator evaluator = ...
Map<Integer, ?> product = producer.getResults();
evaluator.evaluate(cast(product), truth);

然后 Java 会自动为您推断出正确的类型参数。

此外,该I前缀在 Java 社区中通常不受欢迎。

于 2012-09-03T23:38:27.173 回答
1

这不是一个错误,但确实是一个限制。在类型系统社区中众所周知,带有通配符的 Java 具有无法用 Java 语法表示的类型。您的示例展示了一种这样的情况,并证明通配符本质上与 F 有界多态性(即形式的类型参数T extends Something<T>)不兼容。

坦率地说,通配符是一种可怕的类型系统黑客攻击。它们不应该被放入 Java 中。一个人真正想要的以及使您的示例可表达的是适当的存在类型(其中通配符是一种有限的临时变体)。不幸的是,Java 没有它们(尽管 Scala 有)。

于 2012-09-04T18:06:40.977 回答