4

所以我一直在阅读一些关于 Haskell(以及其他函数式语言,我想)中的 Zipper 模式来遍历和修改数据结构的内容,我认为这对我来说是一个磨练创建类型技能的好机会Haskell 中的类,因为该类可以提供一个通用的遍历接口供我编写代码,而与遍历的数据结构无关。

我想我可能需要两个类——一个用于根数据结构,一个用于为遍历第一个而创建的特殊数据结构:

module Zipper where

class Zipper z where
  go'up :: z -> Maybe z
  go'down :: z -> Maybe z
  go'left :: z -> Maybe z
  go'right :: z -> Maybe z

class Zippable t where
  zipper :: (Zipper z) => t -> z
  get :: (Zipper z) => z -> t
  put :: (Zipper z) => z -> t -> z

但是当我用一些简单的数据结构(如列表)尝试这些时:

-- store a path through a list, with preceding elements stored in reverse
data ListZipper a = ListZipper { preceding :: [a], following :: [a] }

instance Zipper (ListZipper a) where
  go'up ListZipper { preceding = [] } = Nothing
  go'up ListZipper { preceding = a:ps, following = fs } = 
      Just $ ListZipper { preceding = ps, following = a:fs }
  go'down ListZipper { following = [] } = Nothing
  go'down ListZipper { preceding = ps, following = a:fs } = 
      Just $ ListZipper { preceding = a:ps, following = fs }
  go'left _ = Nothing
  go'right _ = Nothing

instance Zippable ([a]) where
  zipper as = ListZipper { preceding = [], following = as }
  get = following
  put z as = z { following = as }

或者二叉树:

-- binary tree that only stores values at the leaves
data Tree a = Node { left'child :: Tree a, right'child :: Tree a } | Leaf a
-- store a path down a Tree, with branches not taken stored in reverse
data TreeZipper a = TreeZipper { branches :: [Either (Tree a) (Tree a)], subtree :: Tree a }

instance Zipper (TreeZipper a) where
  go'up TreeZipper { branches = [] } = Nothing
  go'up TreeZipper { branches = (Left l):bs, subtree = r } =  
      Just $ TreeZipper { branches = bs, subtree = Node { left'child = l, right'child = r } }
  go'up TreeZipper { branches = (Right r):bs, subtree = l } =  
      Just $ TreeZipper { branches = bs, subtree = Node { left'child = l, right'child = r } }
  go'down TreeZipper { subtree = Leaf a } = Nothing
  go'down TreeZipper { branches = bs, subtree = Node { left'child = l, right'child = r } } =
      Just $ TreeZipper { branches = (Right r):bs, subtree = l }
  go'left TreeZipper { branches = [] } = Nothing
  go'left TreeZipper { branches = (Right r):bs } = Nothing
  go'left TreeZipper { branches = (Left l):bs, subtree = r } =
      Just $ TreeZipper { branches = (Right r):bs, subtree = l }
  go'right TreeZipper { branches = [] } = Nothing
  go'right TreeZipper { branches = (Left l):bs } = Nothing
  go'right TreeZipper { branches = (Right r):bs, subtree = l } =
      Just $ TreeZipper { branches = (Left l):bs, subtree = r }

instance Zippable (Tree a) where
  zipper t = TreeZipper { branches = [], subtree = t }
  get TreeZipper { subtree = s } = s
  put z s = z { subtree = s }

我无法编译它,我的每个Zippable实例定义都会出现很多这样的错误:

拉链.hs:28:14:
    无法匹配预期的类型“z”
           针对推断类型“ListZipper a”
      `z' 是一个刚性类型变量,由
          Zipper.hs:10:20 中“zipper”的类型签名
    在表达式中:ListZipper {preceding = [], following = as}
    在“拉链”的定义中:
        zipper as = ListZipper {preceding = [], following = as}
    在方法“拉链”的定义中

所以我不确定从这里去哪里。我怀疑我的问题是我试图将这两个实例绑定在一起,而(Zipper z) =>声明只是想z成为 any Zipper

4

2 回答 2

8

您还可以使用类型同义词族代替多参数类型类和功能依赖项。在这样的情况下,它们提供了一个更清晰、更易于理解的解决方案。在这种情况下,类和实例将变为:

class Zippable t where
  type ZipperType t :: *
  enter :: t -> ZipperType t
  focus :: ZipperType t -> t

instance Zippable [a] where
  type ZipperType [a] = ListZipper a
  enter = ...
  focus = ...

Fun with type functions是对已经熟悉 Haskell 的人的类型同义词系列的极好介绍。不久前,我还写了一篇关于如何经常使用类型同义词系列而不是功能依赖关系的文章。

希望这可以帮助!

于 2009-05-19T07:03:20.750 回答
7

(顺便说一句:你的go'up命名方案是……有创意的。Haskell 风格通常是驼峰式。)

你在正确的轨道上。你写的和下面的一样。

{-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}
instance Zippable [a] where
    zipper = ... :: forall z. (Zipper z) => [a] -> z
    get = ... :: forall z. (Zipper z) => z -> [a]
    set = ... :: forall z. (Zipper z) => z -> [a] -> z

(对于所有类型z,给定Zipper z,存在一个zipper :: [a] -> z。)

您正在尝试定义zipper = ... :: [a] -> ListZipper a,这显然过于严格。

您的代码将通过以下最小更改进行类型检查:

{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
class (Zipper z) => Zippable z t where
    zipper :: t -> z
    get :: z -> t
    set :: z -> t -> z
instance Zippable (ListZipper a) [a] where
    ...
instance Zippable (TreeZipper a) (Tree a) where
    ...

请参阅多参数类型类。这是一个 post-Haskell'98 扩展,但 Haskell 实现广泛支持它。

于 2009-05-18T17:32:55.520 回答