人们可能并不总是在编译时知道Type
对象的 ,但可能需要创建Type
.
如何从 a 中获取新的对象实例Type
?
Activator
根命名空间中的类System
非常强大。
将参数传递给构造函数等有很多重载。在以下位置查看文档:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.activator.createinstance.aspx
或(新路径)
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.activator.createinstance
下面是一些简单的例子:
ObjectType instance = (ObjectType)Activator.CreateInstance(objectType);
ObjectType instance = (ObjectType)Activator.CreateInstance("MyAssembly","MyNamespace.ObjectType");
ObjectType instance = (ObjectType)Activator.CreateInstance(objectType);
该类Activator
有一个通用变体,使这更容易一些:
ObjectType instance = Activator.CreateInstance<ObjectType>();
编译表达式是最好的方法!(为了在运行时重复创建实例的性能)。
static readonly Func<X> YCreator = Expression.Lambda<Func<X>>(
Expression.New(typeof(Y).GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes))
).Compile();
X x = YCreator();
统计(2012):
Iterations: 5000000
00:00:00.8481762, Activator.CreateInstance(string, string)
00:00:00.8416930, Activator.CreateInstance(type)
00:00:06.6236752, ConstructorInfo.Invoke
00:00:00.1776255, Compiled expression
00:00:00.0462197, new
统计数据(2015,.net 4.5,x64):
Iterations: 5000000
00:00:00.2659981, Activator.CreateInstance(string, string)
00:00:00.2603770, Activator.CreateInstance(type)
00:00:00.7478936, ConstructorInfo.Invoke
00:00:00.0700757, Compiled expression
00:00:00.0286710, new
统计数据(2015,.net 4.5,x86):
Iterations: 5000000
00:00:00.3541501, Activator.CreateInstance(string, string)
00:00:00.3686861, Activator.CreateInstance(type)
00:00:00.9492354, ConstructorInfo.Invoke
00:00:00.0719072, Compiled expression
00:00:00.0229387, new
统计数据(2017,LINQPad 5.22.02/x64/.NET 4.6):
Iterations: 5000000
No args
00:00:00.3897563, Activator.CreateInstance(string assemblyName, string typeName)
00:00:00.3500748, Activator.CreateInstance(Type type)
00:00:01.0100714, ConstructorInfo.Invoke
00:00:00.1375767, Compiled expression
00:00:00.1337920, Compiled expression (type)
00:00:00.0593664, new
Single arg
00:00:03.9300630, Activator.CreateInstance(Type type)
00:00:01.3881770, ConstructorInfo.Invoke
00:00:00.1425534, Compiled expression
00:00:00.0717409, new
统计数据(2019,x64/.NET 4.8):
Iterations: 5000000
No args
00:00:00.3287835, Activator.CreateInstance(string assemblyName, string typeName)
00:00:00.3122015, Activator.CreateInstance(Type type)
00:00:00.8035712, ConstructorInfo.Invoke
00:00:00.0692854, Compiled expression
00:00:00.0662223, Compiled expression (type)
00:00:00.0337862, new
Single arg
00:00:03.8081959, Activator.CreateInstance(Type type)
00:00:01.2507642, ConstructorInfo.Invoke
00:00:00.0671756, Compiled expression
00:00:00.0301489, new
统计数据(2019,x64/.NET Core 3.0):
Iterations: 5000000
No args
00:00:00.3226895, Activator.CreateInstance(string assemblyName, string typeName)
00:00:00.2786803, Activator.CreateInstance(Type type)
00:00:00.6183554, ConstructorInfo.Invoke
00:00:00.0483217, Compiled expression
00:00:00.0485119, Compiled expression (type)
00:00:00.0434534, new
Single arg
00:00:03.4389401, Activator.CreateInstance(Type type)
00:00:01.0803609, ConstructorInfo.Invoke
00:00:00.0554756, Compiled expression
00:00:00.0462232, new
完整代码:
static X CreateY_New()
{
return new Y();
}
static X CreateY_New_Arg(int z)
{
return new Y(z);
}
static X CreateY_CreateInstance()
{
return (X)Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(Y));
}
static X CreateY_CreateInstance_String()
{
return (X)Activator.CreateInstance("Program", "Y").Unwrap();
}
static X CreateY_CreateInstance_Arg(int z)
{
return (X)Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(Y), new object[] { z, });
}
private static readonly System.Reflection.ConstructorInfo YConstructor =
typeof(Y).GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes);
private static readonly object[] Empty = new object[] { };
static X CreateY_Invoke()
{
return (X)YConstructor.Invoke(Empty);
}
private static readonly System.Reflection.ConstructorInfo YConstructor_Arg =
typeof(Y).GetConstructor(new[] { typeof(int), });
static X CreateY_Invoke_Arg(int z)
{
return (X)YConstructor_Arg.Invoke(new object[] { z, });
}
private static readonly Func<X> YCreator = Expression.Lambda<Func<X>>(
Expression.New(typeof(Y).GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes))
).Compile();
static X CreateY_CompiledExpression()
{
return YCreator();
}
private static readonly Func<X> YCreator_Type = Expression.Lambda<Func<X>>(
Expression.New(typeof(Y))
).Compile();
static X CreateY_CompiledExpression_Type()
{
return YCreator_Type();
}
private static readonly ParameterExpression YCreator_Arg_Param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "z");
private static readonly Func<int, X> YCreator_Arg = Expression.Lambda<Func<int, X>>(
Expression.New(typeof(Y).GetConstructor(new[] { typeof(int), }), new[] { YCreator_Arg_Param, }),
YCreator_Arg_Param
).Compile();
static X CreateY_CompiledExpression_Arg(int z)
{
return YCreator_Arg(z);
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
const int iterations = 5000000;
Console.WriteLine("Iterations: {0}", iterations);
Console.WriteLine("No args");
foreach (var creatorInfo in new[]
{
new {Name = "Activator.CreateInstance(string assemblyName, string typeName)", Creator = (Func<X>)CreateY_CreateInstance},
new {Name = "Activator.CreateInstance(Type type)", Creator = (Func<X>)CreateY_CreateInstance},
new {Name = "ConstructorInfo.Invoke", Creator = (Func<X>)CreateY_Invoke},
new {Name = "Compiled expression", Creator = (Func<X>)CreateY_CompiledExpression},
new {Name = "Compiled expression (type)", Creator = (Func<X>)CreateY_CompiledExpression_Type},
new {Name = "new", Creator = (Func<X>)CreateY_New},
})
{
var creator = creatorInfo.Creator;
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
sum += creator().Z;
var stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
stopwatch.Start();
for (var i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
{
var x = creator();
sum += x.Z;
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("{0}, {1}", stopwatch.Elapsed, creatorInfo.Name);
}
Console.WriteLine("Single arg");
foreach (var creatorInfo in new[]
{
new {Name = "Activator.CreateInstance(Type type)", Creator = (Func<int, X>)CreateY_CreateInstance_Arg},
new {Name = "ConstructorInfo.Invoke", Creator = (Func<int, X>)CreateY_Invoke_Arg},
new {Name = "Compiled expression", Creator = (Func<int, X>)CreateY_CompiledExpression_Arg},
new {Name = "new", Creator = (Func<int, X>)CreateY_New_Arg},
})
{
var creator = creatorInfo.Creator;
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
sum += creator(i).Z;
var stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
stopwatch.Start();
for (var i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
{
var x = creator(i);
sum += x.Z;
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("{0}, {1}", stopwatch.Elapsed, creatorInfo.Name);
}
}
public class X
{
public X() { }
public X(int z) { this.Z = z; }
public int Z;
}
public class Y : X
{
public Y() {}
public Y(int z) : base(z) {}
}
它很简单。假设您的类名是Car
并且命名空间是Vehicles
,然后将参数作为Vehicles.Car
返回类型的对象传递Car
。像这样,您可以动态创建任何类的任何实例。
public object GetInstance(string strNamesapace)
{
Type t = Type.GetType(strNamesapace);
return Activator.CreateInstance(t);
}
如果您的完全限定名称(即,Vehicles.Car
在这种情况下)在另一个程序集中,则Type.GetType
将为空。在这种情况下,您需要遍历所有程序集并找到Type
. 为此,您可以使用以下代码
public object GetInstance(string strFullyQualifiedName)
{
Type type = Type.GetType(strFullyQualifiedName);
if (type != null)
return Activator.CreateInstance(type);
foreach (var asm in AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies())
{
type = asm.GetType(strFullyQualifiedName);
if (type != null)
return Activator.CreateInstance(type);
}
return null;
}
您可以通过调用上述方法来获取实例。
object objClassInstance = GetInstance("Vehicles.Car");
不使用反射:
private T Create<T>() where T : class, new()
{
return new T();
}
如果这是为了在应用程序实例中被大量调用的东西,编译和缓存动态代码会快得多,而不是使用激活器或ConstructorInfo.Invoke()
. 动态编译的两个简单选项是编译的Linq 表达式或一些简单的IL
操作码和DynamicMethod
. 无论哪种方式,当您开始进入紧密循环或多次调用时,差异都会很大。
如果您想使用默认构造函数,那么System.Activator
前面介绍的解决方案可能是最方便的。但是,如果该类型缺少默认构造函数或者您必须使用非默认构造函数,则可以选择使用反射或System.ComponentModel.TypeDescriptor
. 在反射的情况下,只知道类型名称(及其命名空间)就足够了。
使用反射的示例:
ObjectType instance =
(ObjectType)System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().CreateInstance(
typeName: objectType.FulName, // string including namespace of the type
ignoreCase: false,
bindingAttr: BindingFlags.Default,
binder: null, // use default binder
args: new object[] { args, to, constructor },
culture: null, // use CultureInfo from current thread
activationAttributes: null
);
使用示例TypeDescriptor
:
ObjectType instance =
(ObjectType)System.ComponentModel.TypeDescriptor.CreateInstance(
provider: null, // use standard type description provider, which uses reflection
objectType: objectType,
argTypes: new Type[] { types, of, args },
args: new object[] { args, to, constructor }
);
通用T t = new T();
不行吗?
鉴于此问题,当存在无参数 ctor 时,Activator 将起作用。如果这是一个约束考虑使用
System.Runtime.Serialization.FormatterServices.GetSafeUninitializedObject()
public AbstractType New
{
get
{
return (AbstractType) Activator.CreateInstance(GetType());
}
}
我可以解决这个问题,因为我希望为任意类(使用默认构造函数)实现一个简单的 CloneObject 方法
使用泛型方法,您可以要求类型实现 New()。
Public Function CloneObject(Of T As New)(ByVal src As T) As T
Dim result As T = Nothing
Dim cloneable = TryCast(src, ICloneable)
If cloneable IsNot Nothing Then
result = cloneable.Clone()
Else
result = New T
CopySimpleProperties(src, result, Nothing, "clone")
End If
Return result
End Function
使用非泛型假设该类型具有默认构造函数,如果没有,则捕获异常。
Public Function CloneObject(ByVal src As Object) As Object
Dim result As Object = Nothing
Dim cloneable As ICloneable
Try
cloneable = TryCast(src, ICloneable)
If cloneable IsNot Nothing Then
result = cloneable.Clone()
Else
result = Activator.CreateInstance(src.GetType())
CopySimpleProperties(src, result, Nothing, "clone")
End If
Catch ex As Exception
Trace.WriteLine("!!! CloneObject(): " & ex.Message)
End Try
Return result
End Function