Locks
可以自动关闭吗?也就是说,而不是:
Lock someLock = new ReentrantLock();
someLock.lock();
try
{
// ...
}
finally
{
someLock.unlock();
}
...我能说......么:
try (Lock someLock = new ReentrantLock())
{
someLock.lock();
// ...
}
...在 Java 7 中?
Locks
可以自动关闭吗?也就是说,而不是:
Lock someLock = new ReentrantLock();
someLock.lock();
try
{
// ...
}
finally
{
someLock.unlock();
}
...我能说......么:
try (Lock someLock = new ReentrantLock())
{
someLock.lock();
// ...
}
...在 Java 7 中?
我正在考虑自己做这件事并做了这样的事情:
public class CloseableReentrantLock extends ReentrantLock implements AutoCloseable {
public CloseableReentrantLock open() {
this.lock();
return this;
}
@Override
public void close() {
this.unlock();
}
}
然后这是类的用法:
public class MyClass {
private final CloseableReentrantLock lock = new CloseableReentrantLock();
public void myMethod() {
try(CloseableReentrantLock closeableLock = lock.open()) {
// locked stuff
}
}
}
不,Lock
接口(和ReentrantLock
类)都没有实现AutoCloseable
接口,这是使用新的 try-with-resource 语法所必需的。
如果你想让它工作,你可以编写一个简单的包装器:
public class LockWrapper implements AutoCloseable
{
private final Lock _lock;
public LockWrapper(Lock l) {
this._lock = l;
}
public void lock() {
this._lock.lock();
}
public void close() {
this._lock.unlock();
}
}
现在您可以编写如下代码:
try (LockWrapper someLock = new LockWrapper(new ReentrantLock()))
{
someLock.lock();
// ...
}
不过,我认为您最好还是坚持使用旧语法。让您的锁定逻辑完全可见会更安全。
通用的ReentrantLock
既不实现也不提供实现AutoCloseable
try-with-resources 语句所需接口的任何东西。不过,这个概念对于 Java API 来说并不完全陌生,因为FileChannel.lock()
它提供了这个功能。
到目前为止给出的答案共享存在一些问题的解决方案,例如在每次锁定调用时创建不必要的对象、暴露容易出错的 API 或在获取锁定之后但在进入 try-finally 之前存在失败的风险。
Java 7解决方案:
public interface ResourceLock extends AutoCloseable {
/**
* Unlocking doesn't throw any checked exception.
*/
@Override
void close();
}
public class CloseableReentrantLock extends ReentrantLock {
private final ResourceLock unlocker = new ResourceLock() {
@Override
public void close() {
CloseableReentrantLock.this.unlock();
}
};
/**
* @return an {@link AutoCloseable} once the lock has been acquired.
*/
public ResourceLock lockAsResource() {
lock();
return unlocker;
}
}
使用 lambda 的更精简的Java 8解决方案:
public class CloseableReentrantLock extends ReentrantLock {
/**
* @return an {@link AutoCloseable} once the lock has been acquired.
*/
public ResourceLock lockAsResource() {
lock();
return this::unlock;
}
}
示范:
public static void main(String[] args) {
CloseableReentrantLock lock = new CloseableReentrantLock();
try (ResourceLock ignored = lock.lockAsResource()) {
try (ResourceLock ignored2 = lock.lockAsResource()) {
System.out.println(lock.getHoldCount()); // 2
}
}
System.out.println(lock.getHoldCount()); // 0
}
这try-with-resource
适用于在try-block
离开时创建和销毁的资源。它不适用于需要保持活力的资源。每次使用时都不会创建和销毁锁。它们保持活力,只是锁定和解锁。这就是为什么他们不是AutoClosable
。
正如其他人已经建议的那样,可以使用包装器来创建和销毁try-with-resource
块,并在创建和销毁时进行锁定和解锁。
没有完美的解决方案,除非您忽略分配成本(大多数应用程序程序员可以,但锁库编写者不能)。然后你可以使用包装器
@RequiredArgsConstructor(access=AccessLevel.PRIVATE)
public final class MgLockCloseable implements AutoCloseable {
public static MgLockCloseable tryLock(Lock lock) {
return new MgLockCloseable(lock.tryLock() ? lock : null);
}
public static MgLockCloseable lock(Lock lock) {
lock.lock();
return new MgLockCloseable(lock);
}
@Override public void close() {
if (isLocked()) {
lock.unlock();
}
}
public boolean isLocked() {
return lock != null;
}
@Nullable private final Lock lock;
}
在这个结构中
try (LockCloseable lockCloseable = LockCloseable.lock(lock)) {
doSomethingUnderLock();
} // automatic release
另请参阅我关于 CR的问题。
我认为一个简单的 util 方法需要一个锁和 aRunnable
比使用带有锁的 try-with-resource 语句更好。
像这样:
public static void locked(Lock lock, Runnable r) {
lock.lock();
try {
r.run();
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}
}
使用示例:
locked(lock, () -> {
// Do your stuff
});
优点:
坏处
Runnable
实例,这是其他一些解决方案避免的。但这在几乎所有情况下都是微不足道的。基于斯蒂芬的回答和 user2357112 的想法,我编写了以下课程。
MyLock 类本身不可关闭,以强制该类的用户调用 get()。
public class MyLock {
public class Session implements AutoCloseable {
@Override
public void close() {
freeLock();
}
}
private ReentrantLock reentrantLock = new ReentrantLock();
public Session get() {
reentrantLock.lock();
return new Session();
}
private void freeLock() {
reentrantLock.unlock();
}
}
这是一个典型的用法:
MyLock myLock = new MyLock();
try( MyLock.Session session = myLock.get() ) {
// Lock acquired
}
public class AutoCloseableLockWrapper implements AutoCloseable, Lock{
private final Lock lock;
public AutoCloseableLockWrapper(Lock l) {
this.lock = l;
}
@Override
public void lock() {
this.lock.lock();
}
@Override
public void lockInterruptibly() throws InterruptedException {
lock.lockInterruptibly();
}
@Override
public boolean tryLock() {
return lock.tryLock();
}
@Override
public boolean tryLock(long time, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException {
return lock.tryLock(time,unit);
}
@Override
public void unlock() {
lock.unlock();
}
@Override
public Condition newCondition() {
return lock.newCondition();
}
@Override
public void close() {
this.lock.unlock();
}
}
Extending the Java8 solution of @skoskav to ReentrantReadWriteLock:
public interface ResourceLock extends AutoCloseable {
/**
* Unlocking doesn't throw any checked exception.
*/
@Override
void close();
}
public class CloseableReentrantRWLock extends ReentrantReadWriteLock {
/**
* @return an {@link AutoCloseable} once the ReadLock has been acquired
*/
public ResourceLock lockRead() {
this.readLock().lock();
return () -> this.readLock().unlock();
}
/**
* @return an {@link AutoCloseable} once the WriteLock has been acquired.
*/
public ResourceLock lockWrite() {
this.writeLock().lock();
return () -> this.writeLock().unlock();
}
}
public class CloseableLock {
private class Unlocker implements AutoCloseable {
@Override
public void close() throws Exception {
lock.unlock();
}
}
private final Lock lock;
private final Unlocker unlocker = new Unlocker();
public CloseableLock(Lock lock) {
this.lock = lock;
}
public AutoCloseable lock() {
this.lock.lock();
return unlocker;
}
}
利用:
CloseableLock lock = new CloseableLock(new ReentrantLock());
try (AutoCloseable unlocker = lock.lock()) {
// lock is acquired, automatically released at the end of this block
} catch (Exception it) {
// deal with it
}
CloseableLock
制作实施可能很有趣java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock
。
将skoskav的出色答案扩展到ReadWriteLock
:
CloseableLock.java:
public interface CloseableLock extends AutoCloseable
{
/**
* Release the lock.
*/
@Override
void close();
}
ReadWriteLockAsResource:
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReadWriteLock;
/**
* Enables the use of {@code try-with-resources} with {@code ReadWriteLock}.
*/
public final class ReadWriteLockAsResource
{
private final ReadWriteLock lock;
/**
* @param lock a lock
* @throws NullPointerException if {@code lock} is null
*/
public ReadWriteLockAsResource(ReadWriteLock lock)
{
if (lock == null)
throw new NullPointerException("lock may not be null");
this.lock = lock;
}
/**
* Starts a new read-lock.
*
* @return the read-lock as a resource
*/
public CloseableLock readLock()
{
Lock readLock = lock.readLock();
readLock.lock();
return readLock::unlock;
}
/**
* Starts a new write-lock.
*
* @return the write-lock as a resource
*/
public CloseableLock writeLock()
{
Lock writeLock = lock.writeLock();
writeLock.lock();
return writeLock::unlock;
}
/**
* Returns a new condition.
*
* @return a new condition
*/
public Condition newCondition()
{
return lock.writeLock().newCondition();
}
}
用法:
public final class GuideToTheUniverse
{
private final LockAsResource lock = new LockAsResource(new ReentrantReadWriteLock());
public int answerToLife()
{
try (CloseableLock writeLock = lock.writeLock())
{
System.out.println("Look ma', no hands!");
return 42;
}
}
}
这是另一种效果很好并且超级高效的解决方案,但代价是ThreadLocal
每次锁定请求都需要查找。此解决方案缓存AutoCloseable
部件/包装器并在每个线程的基础上重用它。
ResourceLock
首先,我们有一个围绕法线的包装类Lock
,我们将拥有许多实例。这是我们要重用的部分。包装器实现了Lock
接口,因此它的行为类似于正常Lock
但可以自动关闭的接口:
public class ResourceLock implements AutoCloseable, Lock {
private Lock lock;
public ResourceLock(Lock lock) {
this(lock, true);
}
public ResourceLock(Lock lock, boolean eagerLock) {
this.lock = lock;
if (eagerLock) {
lock.lock();
}
}
public void lock() {
lock.lock();
}
public void lockInterruptibly() throws InterruptedException {
lock.lockInterruptibly();
}
public Condition newCondition() {
return lock.newCondition();
}
ResourceLock setLock(Lock lock) {
this.lock = lock;
return this;
}
public boolean tryLock() {
return lock.tryLock();
}
public boolean tryLock(long time, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException {
return lock.tryLock(time, unit);
}
public void unlock() {
lock.unlock();
}
@Override
public void close() {
lock.unlock();
}
}
在不可重用的形式中,您只需像这样使用它:
try (ResourceLock ignore = new ResourceLock(rwl.writeLock())) {
// Resource locked in here
}
或者我们可以添加一个能够缓存的包装器,它可以让我们在ResourceLock
每个线程中重用对象。
public class ResourceLockCache {
private final Lock lock;
private final Supplier<ResourceLock> cachingStrategy;
public ResourceLockCache(Lock lock) {
this.lock = lock;
final ThreadLocal<ResourceLock> strategy = new ThreadLocal<ResourceLock>() {
@Override
protected ResourceLock initialValue() {
return new ResourceLock();
}
};
this.cachingStrategy = strategy::get;
}
public ResourceLockCache(Lock lock, Supplier<ResourceLock> cachingStrategy) {
this.lock = lock;
this.cachingStrategy = cachingStrategy;
}
public ResourceLock getAsResource() {
final ResourceLock activeLock = cachingStrategy.get();
activeLock.setLock(lock);
return activeLock;
}
public ResourceLock getAsResourceAndLock() {
final ResourceLock activeLock = cachingStrategy.get();
activeLock.setLock(lock);
activeLock.lock();
return activeLock;
}
}
现在我们可以重用每个可自动关闭的锁:
ResourceLockCache rlc = new ResourceLockCache(new ReentrantLock());
// Or this to change caching strategy to new object per lock
ResourceLockCache rlc2 = new ResourceLockCache(new ReentrantLock(), ResourceLock::new);
try (ResourceLock ignore = rlc.getAsResourceAndLock()) {
// Resource locked in here
}
还有一个ReadWriteLock
变体可以满足更复杂的锁定需求。它实现了ReadWriteLock
接口,因此它更加通用,因为您可以使用复杂的锁定策略,例如tryLock
:
public class ResourceRWLockCache implements ReadWriteLock {
private final ReadWriteLock rwl;
private final Supplier<ResourceLock> cachingStrategy;
public ResourceRWLockCache(ReadWriteLock rwl) {
this.rwl = rwl;
final ThreadLocal<ResourceLock> strategy = new ThreadLocal<ResourceLock>() {
@Override
protected ResourceLock initialValue() {
return new ResourceLock();
}
};
this.cachingStrategy = strategy::get;
}
public ResourceRWLockCache(ReadWriteLock rwl, Supplier<ResourceLock> cachingStrategy) {
this.rwl = rwl;
this.cachingStrategy = cachingStrategy;
}
public ResourceLock readLock() {
final ResourceLock activeLock = cachingStrategy.get();
activeLock.setLock(rwl.readLock());
return activeLock;
}
public ResourceLock readLockAndLock() {
final ResourceLock activeLock = cachingStrategy.get();
activeLock.setLock(rwl.readLock());
activeLock.lock();
return activeLock;
}
public ResourceLock writeLock() {
final ResourceLock activeLock = cachingStrategy.get();
activeLock.setLock(rwl.writeLock());
return activeLock;
}
public ResourceLock writeLockAndLock() {
final ResourceLock activeLock = cachingStrategy.get();
activeLock.setLock(rwl.writeLock());
activeLock.lock();
return activeLock;
}
}
ResourceRWLockCache rwl = new ResourceRWLockCache(new ReentrantReadWriteLock());
// Or this to change caching strategy to new object per lock
ResourceRWLockCache rwl2 = new ResourceRWLockCache(new ReentrantReadWriteLock(), ResourceLock::new);
try (ResourceLock ignore = rwl.writeLockAndLock()) {
// Resource locked in here
}
希望此解决方案有助于重用资源释放处理程序的单锁和多锁策略。