1

为了理解 JAX 的反向模式自动差异，我尝试为 softmax 编写一个 custom_vjp，如下所示：

import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp
import numpy as np

@jax.custom_vjp
def stablesoftmax(x):
    print(f"input: {x} shape: {x.shape}")
    expc = jnp.exp(x - jnp.amax(x))
    return expc / jnp.sum(expc)

def ssm_fwd(x):
    s = stablesoftmax(x)
    return s, s

def ssm_bwd(acts, d_dacts):
    dacts_dinput = jnp.diag(acts) - jnp.outer(acts, acts)  # Jacobian
    d_dinput = jnp.dot(d_dacts, dacts_dinput)  # Vector-Jacobian product
    print(f"Saved activations:\n{acts} shape: {acts.shape}")
    print(f"d/d_acts:\n{d_dacts} shape: {d_dacts.shape}")
    print(f"d_acts/d_input (Jacobian of softmax):\n{dacts_dinput} shape: {dacts_dinput.shape}")
    print(f"d/d_input:\n{d_dinput} shape: {d_dinput.shape}")
    return d_dinput

stablesoftmax.defvjp(ssm_fwd, ssm_bwd)

print(f"JAX version: {jax.__version__}")
y = np.array([1., 2., 3.])
a = stablesoftmax(y)
softmax_jac_fun = jax.jacrev(stablesoftmax)
dsoftmax_dy = softmax_jac_fun(y)
print(f"Softmax Jacobian: {dsoftmax_dy}")

但是当我调用 jacrev 时，我收到关于 VJP 结果结构与 softmax 输入结构不匹配的错误：

JAX version: 0.2.13
input: [1. 2. 3.] shape: (3,)
WARNING:absl:No GPU/TPU found, falling back to CPU. (Set TF_CPP_MIN_LOG_LEVEL=0 and rerun for more info.)
input: [1. 2. 3.] shape: (3,)
Saved activations:
[0.09003057 0.24472848 0.66524094] shape: (3,)
d/d_acts:
Traced<ShapedArray(float32[3])>with<BatchTrace(level=1/0)>
  with val = array([[1., 0., 0.],
                    [0., 1., 0.],
                    [0., 0., 1.]], dtype=float32)
       batch_dim = 0 shape: (3,)
d_acts/d_input (Jacobian of softmax):
[[ 0.08192507 -0.02203305 -0.05989202]
 [-0.02203305  0.18483645 -0.1628034 ]
 [-0.05989202 -0.1628034   0.22269544]] shape: (3, 3)
d/d_input:
Traced<ShapedArray(float32[3])>with<BatchTrace(level=1/0)>
  with val = DeviceArray([[ 0.08192507, -0.02203305, -0.05989202],
                          [-0.02203305,  0.18483645, -0.1628034 ],
                          [-0.05989202, -0.1628034 ,  0.22269544]], dtype=float32)
       batch_dim = 0 shape: (3,)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "analysis/vjp_test.py", line 30, in <module>
    dsoftmax_dy = softmax_jac_fun(y)
jax._src.source_info_util.JaxStackTraceBeforeTransformation: TypeError: Custom VJP rule must produce an output with the same container (pytree) structure as the args tuple of the primal function, and in particular must produce a tuple of length equal to the number of arguments to the primal function, but got VJP output structure PyTreeDef(*) for primal input structure PyTreeDef((*,)).

但是，当我打印它们都具有形状 (3,) 但 JAX 似乎不同意的形状时，您可以看到？（实际上输入和输出是 3 x 3 矩阵，但这是因为 JAX 试图在 jacrev 中对 JVP 进行 vmap，因此一次性拉回 R(3) 的整个基础（即 3x3 单位矩阵）。

注意：如果我直接使用 jax.grad 或 jax.vjp，我会得到同样的错误。

4

1 回答 1

1

根据custom_vjp文档：

的输出bwd必须是长度等于原始函数的参数数量的元组

所以向后传递中的 return 语句应该是这样的：

def ssm_bwd(acts, d_dacts):
    ...
    return (d_dinput,)
于 2021-06-01T16:27:20.323 回答