您可以使用类型擦除迭代器范围,Boost 以any_range
.
当心这些的性能成本,这很快就会变得非常明显。我会重新考虑这种方法,除非您非常确定这不是在任何热门路径上,并且可读性比性能更受关注。
活在 CoCompiler Explorer
#include <boost/range/join.hpp>
#include <boost/range/any_range.hpp>
// for demo only:
#include <boost/range/algorithm/for_each.hpp>
#include <boost/lambda/lambda.hpp>
#include <fmt/ranges.h>
template<class Range>
bool Check(Range const& r) {
bool odd_len = boost::size(r) % 2;
fmt::print("Check {}, odd_len? {}\n", r, odd_len);
return odd_len;
}
template<class Range>
void Process(Range const& r) {
fmt::print("Processing {}\n", r);
using namespace boost::lambda;
for_each(r, _1 *= _1);
}
template<class IterableType>
void CheckAndProcessIterables(IterableType& a, IterableType& b, IterableType& c) {
using V = typename boost::range_value<IterableType>::type;
using ErasedRange= boost::any_range<V, boost::forward_traversal_tag>;
ErasedRange range{}; // empty range
if (Check(a)) {
range = boost::range::join(range, a);
}
if (Check(b)) {
range = boost::range::join(range, b);
}
if (Check(c)) {
range = boost::range::join(range, c);
}
Process(range);
}
int main() {
std::vector a{1, 2, 3}, b{4, 5}, c{6, 7, 8};
CheckAndProcessIterables(a, b, c);
fmt::print("After process: a:{} b:{} c:{}\n", a, b, c);
}
印刷
Check {1, 2, 3}, odd_len? true
Check {4, 5}, odd_len? false
Check {6, 7, 8}, odd_len? true
Processing {1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8}
After process: a:{1, 4, 9} b:{4, 5} c:{36, 49, 64}