我试图测试我的一次性配置，以确保我设置的所有配置都是正确的，并且行为符合我的预期
我似乎遇到了重复发送的问题
public static void main(String[] args) {
MessageProducer producer = new ProducerBuilder()
.setBootstrapServers("kafka:9992")
.setKeySerializerClass(StringSerializer.class)
.setValueSerializerClass(StringSerializer.class)
.setProducerEnableIdempotence(true).build();
MessageConsumer consumer = new ConsumerBuilder()
.setBootstrapServers("kafka:9992")
.setIsolationLevel("read_committed")
.setTopics("someTopic2")
.setGroupId("bla")
.setKeyDeserializerClass(StringDeserializer.class)
.setValueDeserializerClass(MapDeserializer.class)
.setConsumerMessageLogic(new ConsumerMessageLogic() {
@Override
public void onMessage(ConsumerRecord cr, Acknowledgment acknowledgment) {
producer.sendMessage(new TopicPartition("someTopic2", cr.partition()),
new OffsetAndMetadata(cr.offset() + 1),"something1", "im in transaction", cr.key());
acknowledgment.acknowledge();
}
}).build();
consumer.start();
}
这是我的“测试”，您可以假设构建器放置了正确的配置。
ConsumerMessageLogic 是一个类，它处理恰好一次语义所支持的读取-过程-写入的“过程”部分
在生产者类中，我有一个发送消息方法，如下所示：
public void sendMessage(TopicPartition topicPartition, OffsetAndMetadata offsetAndMetadata,String sendToTopic, V message, PK partitionKey) {
try {
KafkaRecord<PK, V> partitionAndMessagePair = producerMessageLogic.prepareMessage(topicPartition.topic(), partitionKey, message);
if(kafkaTemplate.getProducerFactory().transactionCapable()){
kafkaTemplate.executeInTransaction(operations -> {
sendMessage(message, partitionKey, sendToTopic, partitionAndMessagePair, operations);
operations.sendOffsetsToTransaction(
Map.of(topicPartition, offsetAndMetadata),"bla");
return true;
});
}else{
sendMessage(message, partitionKey, topicPartition.topic(), partitionAndMessagePair, kafkaTemplate);
}
}catch (Exception e){
failureHandler.onFailure(partitionKey, message, e);
}
}
我像这样创建我的消费者：
/**
* Start the message consumer
* The record event will be delegate on the onMessage()
*/
public void start() {
initConsumerMessageListenerContainer();
container.start();
}
/**
* Initialize the kafka message listener
*/
private void initConsumerMessageListenerContainer() {
// start a acknowledge message listener to allow the manual commit
messageListener = consumerMessageLogic::onMessage;
// start and initialize the consumer container
container = initContainer(messageListener);
// sets the number of consumers, the topic partitions will be divided by the consumers
container.setConcurrency(springConcurrency);
springContainerPollTimeoutOpt.ifPresent(p -> container.getContainerProperties().setPollTimeout(p));
if (springAckMode != null) {
container.getContainerProperties().setAckMode(springAckMode);
}
}
private ConcurrentMessageListenerContainer<PK, V> initContainer(AcknowledgingMessageListener<PK, V> messageListener) {
return new ConcurrentMessageListenerContainer<>(
consumerFactory(props),
containerProperties(messageListener));
}
当我创建我的生产者时，我使用 UUID 作为事务前缀创建它，就像这样
public ProducerFactory<PK, V> producerFactory(boolean isTransactional) {
ProducerFactory<PK, V> res = new DefaultKafkaProducerFactory<>(props);
if(isTransactional){
((DefaultKafkaProducerFactory<PK, V>) res).setTransactionIdPrefix(UUID.randomUUID().toString());
((DefaultKafkaProducerFactory<PK, V>) res).setProducerPerConsumerPartition(true);
}
return res;
}
现在一切都设置好后，我在一个主题上启动了 2 个实例，每个实例有 2 个分区，每个实例从使用的主题中获得 1 个分区。
我发送一条消息并在调试中等待实例 A 中的事务超时（模拟连接丢失），一旦超时通过另一个实例（实例 B）自动处理记录并将其发送到目标主题导致重新平衡发生了
到目前为止，一切都很好。现在，当我在实例 A 上释放断点时，它说它正在重新平衡并且无法提交，但我仍然在我的目标主题中看到另一个输出记录。
我的期望是，一旦我释放断点，实例 A 将不会继续其工作，因为记录已被处理。
难道我做错了什么？这个场景可以实现吗？
编辑2：
在加里关于事务中执行的评论之后，如果我冻结其中一个实例直到超时并在另一个实例处理记录后释放它，然后冻结的实例处理并为输出主题生成相同的记录，我会得到重复的记录...
public static void main(String[] args) {
MessageProducer producer = new ProducerBuilder()
.setBootstrapServers("kafka:9992")
.setKeySerializerClass(StringSerializer.class)
.setValueSerializerClass(StringSerializer.class)
.setProducerEnableIdempotence(true).build();
MessageConsumer consumer = new ConsumerBuilder()
.setBootstrapServers("kafka:9992")
.setIsolationLevel("read_committed")
.setTopics("someTopic2")
.setGroupId("bla")
.setKeyDeserializerClass(StringDeserializer.class)
.setValueDeserializerClass(MapDeserializer.class)
.setConsumerMessageLogic(new ConsumerMessageLogic() {
@Override
public void onMessage(ConsumerRecord cr, Acknowledgment acknowledgment) {
producer.sendMessage("something1", "im in transaction");
}
}).build();
consumer.start(producer.getProducerFactory());
}
生产者中没有 executeInTransaction 的新 sendMessage 方法
public void sendMessage(V message, PK partitionKey, String topicName) {
try {
KafkaRecord<PK, V> partitionAndMessagePair = producerMessageLogic.prepareMessage(topicName, partitionKey, message);
sendMessage(message, partitionKey, topicName, partitionAndMessagePair, kafkaTemplate);
}catch (Exception e){
failureHandler.onFailure(partitionKey, message, e);
}
}
以及我将消费者容器创建更改为具有与建议的相同生产者工厂的事务管理器
/**
* Initialize the kafka message listener
*/
private void initConsumerMessageListenerContainer(ProducerFactory<PK,V> producerFactory) {
// start a acknowledge message listener to allow the manual commit
acknowledgingMessageListener = consumerMessageLogic::onMessage;
// start and initialize the consumer container
container = initContainer(acknowledgingMessageListener, producerFactory);
// sets the number of consumers, the topic partitions will be divided by the consumers
container.setConcurrency(springConcurrency);
springContainerPollTimeoutOpt.ifPresent(p -> container.getContainerProperties().setPollTimeout(p));
if (springAckMode != null) {
container.getContainerProperties().setAckMode(springAckMode);
}
}
private ConcurrentMessageListenerContainer<PK, V> initContainer(AcknowledgingMessageListener<PK, V> messageListener, ProducerFactory<PK,V> producerFactory) {
return new ConcurrentMessageListenerContainer<>(
consumerFactory(props),
containerProperties(messageListener, producerFactory));
}
@NonNull
private ContainerProperties containerProperties(MessageListener<PK, V> messageListener, ProducerFactory<PK,V> producerFactory) {
ContainerProperties containerProperties = new ContainerProperties(topics);
containerProperties.setMessageListener(messageListener);
containerProperties.setTransactionManager(new KafkaTransactionManager<>(producerFactory));
return containerProperties;
}
我的期望是代理一旦从冻结的实例接收到处理过的记录，它就会知道该记录已经由另一个实例处理，因为它包含完全相同的元数据（或者是吗？我的意思是，PID 会不同，但它应该不同吗？）
也许我正在寻找的场景在当前甚至不支持 kafka 和 spring 提供的支持......
如果我有 2 个读进程写实例 - 这意味着我有 2 个具有 2 个不同 PID 的生产者。
现在，当我冻结其中一个实例时，当未冻结的实例由于重新平衡而获得记录进程责任时，它将使用自己的 PID 和元数据中的序列发送记录。
现在，当我释放冻结的实例时，他发送了相同的记录，但有自己的 PID，所以经纪人不可能知道它是重复的......
我错了吗？我怎样才能避免这种情况？我虽然重新平衡停止了实例并且不让它完成它的过程（他产生重复记录的地方）因为他不再对该记录负责
添加日志：冻结实例：您可以在 10:53:34 看到冻结时间，我在 10:54:02 发布它（重新平衡时间为 10 秒）
2020-06-16 10:53:34,393 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.c.DefaultKafkaProducerFactory.debug:296]
Created new Producer: CloseSafeProducer
[delegate=org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer@5c7f5906]
2020-06-16 10:53:34,394 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.c.DefaultKafkaProducerFactory.debug:296]
CloseSafeProducer
[delegate=org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer@5c7f5906]
beginTransaction()
2020-06-16 10:53:34,395 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.t.KafkaTransactionManager.doBegin:149] Created
Kafka transaction on producer [CloseSafeProducer
[delegate=org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer@5c7f5906]]
2020-06-16 10:54:02,157 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}] [kafka-
coordinator-heartbeat-thread | bla]
[o.a.k.c.c.i.AbstractCoordinator.:] [Consumer clientId=consumer-bla-1,
groupId=bla] Group coordinator X.X.X.X:9992 (id: 2147482646 rack:
null) is unavailable or invalid, will attempt rediscovery
2020-06-16 10:54:02,181 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1]
[o.s.k.l.KafkaMessageListenerContainer$ListenerConsumer.debug:296]
Sending offsets to transaction: {someTopic2-
0=OffsetAndMetadata{offset=23, leaderEpoch=null, metadata=''}}
2020-06-16 10:54:02,189 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}] [kafka-
producer-network-thread | producer-b76e8aba-8149-48f8-857b-
a19195f5a20abla.someTopic2.0] [i.i.k.s.p.SimpleSuccessHandler.:] Sent
message=[im in transaction] with offset=[252] to topic something1
2020-06-16 10:54:02,193 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}] [kafka-
producer-network-thread | producer-b76e8aba-8149-48f8-857b-
a19195f5a20abla.someTopic2.0] [o.a.k.c.p.i.TransactionManager.:]
[Producer clientId=producer-b76e8aba-8149-48f8-857b-
a19195f5a20abla.someTopic2.0, transactionalId=b76e8aba-8149-48f8-857b-
a19195f5a20abla.someTopic2.0] Discovered group coordinator
X.X.X.X:9992 (id: 1001 rack: null)
2020-06-16 10:54:02,263 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}] [kafka-
coordinator-heartbeat-thread | bla]
[o.a.k.c.c.i.AbstractCoordinator.:] [Consumer clientId=consumer-bla-1,
groupId=bla] Discovered group coordinator 192.168.144.1:9992 (id:
2147482646 rack: null)
2020-06-16 10:54:02,295 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.t.KafkaTransactionManager.processCommit:740]
Initiating transaction commit
2020-06-16 10:54:02,296 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.c.DefaultKafkaProducerFactory.debug:296]
CloseSafeProducer
[delegate=org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer@5c7f5906]
commitTransaction()
2020-06-16 10:54:02,299 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1]
[o.s.k.l.KafkaMessageListenerContainer$ListenerConsumer.debug:296]
Commit list: {}
2020-06-16 10:54:02,301 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.a.k.c.c.i.AbstractCoordinator.:] [Consumer
clientId=consumer-bla-1, groupId=bla] Attempt to heartbeat failed for
since member id consumer-bla-1-b3ad1c09-ad06-4bc4-a891-47a2288a830f is
not valid.
2020-06-16 10:54:02,302 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.a.k.c.c.i.ConsumerCoordinator.:] [Consumer
clientId=consumer-bla-1, groupId=bla] Giving away all assigned
partitions as lost since generation has been reset,indicating that
consumer is no longer part of the group
2020-06-16 10:54:02,302 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.a.k.c.c.i.ConsumerCoordinator.:] [Consumer
clientId=consumer-bla-1, groupId=bla] Lost previously assigned
partitions someTopic2-0
2020-06-16 10:54:02,302 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.l.ConcurrentMessageListenerContainer.info:279]
bla: partitions lost: [someTopic2-0]
2020-06-16 10:54:02,303 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.l.ConcurrentMessageListenerContainer.info:279]
bla: partitions revoked: [someTopic2-0]
2020-06-16 10:54:02,303 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1]
[o.s.k.l.KafkaMessageListenerContainer$ListenerConsumer.debug:296]
Commit list: {}
接管分区并在重新平衡后产生记录的常规实例
2020-06-16 10:53:46,536 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.c.DefaultKafkaProducerFactory.debug:296]
Created new Producer: CloseSafeProducer
[delegate=org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer@26c76153]
2020-06-16 10:53:46,537 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.c.DefaultKafkaProducerFactory.debug:296]
CloseSafeProducer
[delegate=org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer@26c76153]
beginTransaction()
2020-06-16 10:53:46,539 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.t.KafkaTransactionManager.doBegin:149] Created
Kafka transaction on producer [CloseSafeProducer
[delegate=org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer@26c76153]]
2020-06-16 10:53:46,556 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1]
[o.s.k.l.KafkaMessageListenerContainer$ListenerConsumer.debug:296]
Sending offsets to transaction: {someTopic2-
0=OffsetAndMetadata{offset=23, leaderEpoch=null, metadata=''}}
2020-06-16 10:53:46,563 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}] [kafka-
producer-network-thread | producer-1d8e74d3-8986-4458-89b7-
6d3e5756e213bla.someTopic2.0] [i.i.k.s.p.SimpleSuccessHandler.:] Sent
message=[im in transaction] with offset=[250] to topic something1
2020-06-16 10:53:46,566 INFO [${sys:spring.application.name}] [kafka-
producer-network-thread | producer-1d8e74d3-8986-4458-89b7-
6d3e5756e213bla.someTopic2.0] [o.a.k.c.p.i.TransactionManager.:]
[Producer clientId=producer-1d8e74d3-8986-4458-89b7-
6d3e5756e213bla.someTopic2.0, transactionalId=1d8e74d3-8986-4458-89b7-
6d3e5756e213bla.someTopic2.0] Discovered group coordinator
X.X.X.X:9992 (id: 1001 rack: null)
2020-06-16 10:53:46,668 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.t.KafkaTransactionManager.processCommit:740]
Initiating transaction commit
2020-06-16 10:53:46,669 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1] [o.s.k.c.DefaultKafkaProducerFactory.debug:296]
CloseSafeProducer
[delegate=org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer@26c76153]
commitTransaction()
2020-06-16 10:53:46,672 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1]
[o.s.k.l.KafkaMessageListenerContainer$ListenerConsumer.debug:296]
Commit list: {}
2020-06-16 10:53:51,673 DEBUG [${sys:spring.application.name}]
[consumer-0-C-1]
[o.s.k.l.KafkaMessageListenerContainer$ListenerConsumer.debug:296]
Received: 0 records
我注意到他们都注意到完全相同的提交偏移量
Sending offsets to transaction: {someTopic2-0=OffsetAndMetadata{offset=23, leaderEpoch=null, metadata=''}}
我想当他们试图提交完全相同的事情时，经纪人会中止其中一项交易......
我还注意到，如果我将 transaction.timeout.ms 减少到仅 2 秒，无论我在调试时冻结实例多长时间，它都不会中止事务......
也许 transaction.timeout.ms 的计时器仅在我发送消息后才开始？