0

我正在尝试在 Kaggle（https://www.kaggle.com/uciml/breast-cancer-wisconsin-data）的数据集上理解和实现 R 中的一类分类。

尝试打印混淆矩阵时，您会给出错误：

Error in! All.equal (nrow (data), ncol (data)): invalid type argument

我究竟做错了什么？

library(caret)
library(dplyr)
library(e1071)
library(NLP)
library(tm)
library(data.table)

ds = read.csv('C:/Users/hugos/Desktop/FS Dataset/Health/data_cancer.csv', 
              header = TRUE)

mycols <- c("id","diagnosis","radius_mean","texture_mean","perimeter_mean","area_mean",              
             "smoothness_mean","compactness_mean","concavity_mean",         
             "concave.points_mean","symmetry_mean","fractal_dimension_mean", 
             "radius_se","texture_se","perimeter_se",           
             "area_se","smoothness_se","compactness_se",         
             "concavity_se","concave.points_se","symmetry_se",            
             "fractal_dimension_se","radius_worst","texture_worst",          
             "perimeter_worst","area_worst","smoothness_worst",       
             "compactness_worst","concavity_worst","concave.points_worst",   
             "symmetry_worst","fractal_dimension_worst")

#Convert to numeric
setDT(ds)[, (mycols) := lapply(.SD, as.numeric), .SDcols = mycols]

#Convert classification to logical
data <- ds[,.(id,radius_mean,texture_mean,perimeter_mean,area_mean,smoothness_mean,compactness_mean,concavity_mean,concave.points_mean,symmetry_mean,fractal_dimension_mean,radius_se,texture_se,perimeter_se,area_se,smoothness_se,compactness_se,concavity_se,concave.points_se,symmetry_se,fractal_dimension_se,radius_worst,texture_worst,perimeter_worst,area_worst,smoothness_worst,compactness_worst,concavity_worst,concave.points_worst,symmetry_worst,fractal_dimension_worst,diagnosis = ds$diagnosis == "TRUE")]

dataclean <- na.omit(data)

#Separating train and test
inTrain<-createDataPartition(1:nrow(dataclean),p=0.7,list=FALSE)
train<- dataclean[inTrain]
test <- dataclean[-inTrain]


svm.model<-svm(diagnosis ~ id+radius_mean+texture_mean+perimeter_mean+area_mean+smoothness_mean+compactness_mean+concavity_mean+concave.points_mean+symmetry_mean+fractal_dimension_mean+radius_se+texture_se+perimeter_se+area_se+smoothness_se+compactness_se+concavity_se+concave.points_se+symmetry_se+fractal_dimension_se+radius_worst+texture_worst+perimeter_worst+area_worst+smoothness_worst+compactness_worst+concavity_worst+concave.points_worst+symmetry_worst+fractal_dimension_worst, data = train,
               type='one-classification',
               trControl = fitControl,
               nu=0.10,
               scale=TRUE,
               kernel="radial",
               metric = "ROC")

#Perform predictions 
svm.predtrain<-predict(svm.model,train)
svm.predtest<-predict(svm.model,test)

confTrain <- table(Predicted=svm.predtrain,
                   Reference=train$diagnosis[as.integer(names(svm.predtrain))])
confTest <- table(Predicted=svm.predtest,
                  Reference=test$diagnosis[as.integer(names(svm.predtest))])

confusionMatrix(confTest,positive='TRUE')

print(confTrain)
print(confTest)
4

1 回答 1

1

您的问题出在这一行：

#Convert classification to logical
data <- ds[, .(id, radius_mean, ..., diagnosis = ds$diagnosis == "TRUE")]

我假设您使用的是 R 版本 4.0，因为该read.csv函数的默认行为是现在不将字符列转换为因子。这个命令：

#Convert to numeric
setDT(ds)[, (mycols) := lapply(.SD, as.numeric), .SDcols = mycols]

然后会将所有诊断转换为 NA，因为它们是分别代表恶性和良性的“M”或“B”。

因此，请确保在导入数据时将字符串转换为因子。

ds = read.csv('.../data_cancer.csv', header = TRUE, stringsAsFactors = TRUE)
str(ds)
'data.frame':   569 obs. of  33 variables:
 $ id                     : int  842302 842517 84300903 84348301 84358402 843786 844359 ...
 $ diagnosis              : Factor w/ 2 levels "B","M": 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...

我想有些人需要一段时间才能习惯 R 的这种新行为。您将分类转换为逻辑的命令应该是：

data <- ds[, .(id, radius_mean, ..., diagnosis = diagnosis == 2)] # or  == 1 ?

然后使您所有剩余的命令工作。

confusionMatrix(confTest, positive='TRUE')

Confusion Matrix and Statistics

         Reference
Predicted FALSE TRUE
    FALSE    10    8  # Note these numbers may change
    TRUE    100   50

               Accuracy : 0.3571          
                 95% CI : (0.2848, 0.4346)
    No Information Rate : 0.6548          
    P-Value [Acc > NIR] : 1               

                  Kappa : -0.0342         

 Mcnemar's Test P-Value : <2e-16          

            Sensitivity : 0.86207         
            Specificity : 0.09091         
         Pos Pred Value : 0.33333         
         Neg Pred Value : 0.55556         
             Prevalence : 0.34524         
         Detection Rate : 0.29762         
   Detection Prevalence : 0.89286         
      Balanced Accuracy : 0.47649         

       'Positive' Class : TRUE
于 2020-05-17T03:49:42.733 回答