0

推理器未能将类别分类为定义为另一个类别 B 的补充的类别 A。

我在 protege 5 中创建了一个最小的 OWL 本体示例（基于著名的比萨示例）来说明这个问题。

有两种披萨类：Americana 和 Soho，前者有肉馅，后者有蔬菜馅。然后有两个类别：VegetarianPizza 定义为带有蔬菜配料的比萨饼，NonVegetarianPizza 定义为那些不是 VegetarianPizza 的比萨饼。Soho 被正确归类为 VegetarianPizza，但 Americana 没有被归类为 NonVegetarianPizza。

有人可以解释什么是错的吗？

这是代码：

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Ontology xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
 xml:base="http://www.pizza.com/ontologies/pizza-minimal.owl"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"
 xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
 xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
 ontologyIRI="http://www.pizza.com/ontologies/pizza-minimal.owl"
 versionIRI="http://www.pizza.com/ontologies/pizza-minimal.owl/v1.0">
<Prefix name="" IRI="http://www.pizza.com/ontologies/pizza-minimal.owl"/>
<Prefix name="owl" IRI="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"/>
<Prefix name="rdf" IRI="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"/>
<Prefix name="xml" IRI="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"/>
<Prefix name="xsd" IRI="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"/>
<Prefix name="rdfs" IRI="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"/>
<Declaration>
    <ObjectProperty IRI="#isToppingOf"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
    <ObjectProperty IRI="#hasTopping"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
    <Class IRI="#NonVegetarianPizza"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
    <Class IRI="#SohoPizza"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
    <Class IRI="#VegetableTopping"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
    <Class IRI="#VegetarianPizza"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
    <Class IRI="#Pizza"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
    <Class IRI="#MeatTopping"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
    <Class IRI="#PizzaTopping"/>
</Declaration>
<Declaration>
    <Class IRI="#AmericanaPizza"/>
</Declaration>
<EquivalentClasses>
    <Class IRI="#NonVegetarianPizza"/>
    <ObjectIntersectionOf>
        <Class IRI="#Pizza"/>
        <ObjectComplementOf>
            <Class IRI="#VegetarianPizza"/>
        </ObjectComplementOf>
    </ObjectIntersectionOf>
</EquivalentClasses>
<EquivalentClasses>
    <Class IRI="#VegetarianPizza"/>
    <ObjectIntersectionOf>
        <Class IRI="#Pizza"/>
        <ObjectAllValuesFrom>
            <ObjectProperty IRI="#hasTopping"/>
            <Class IRI="#VegetableTopping"/>
        </ObjectAllValuesFrom>
    </ObjectIntersectionOf>
</EquivalentClasses>
<SubClassOf>
    <Class IRI="#AmericanaPizza"/>
    <Class IRI="#Pizza"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
    <Class IRI="#AmericanaPizza"/>
    <ObjectSomeValuesFrom>
        <ObjectProperty IRI="#hasTopping"/>
        <Class IRI="#MeatTopping"/>
    </ObjectSomeValuesFrom>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
    <Class IRI="#AmericanaPizza"/>
    <ObjectAllValuesFrom>
        <ObjectProperty IRI="#hasTopping"/>
        <Class IRI="#MeatTopping"/>
    </ObjectAllValuesFrom>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
    <Class IRI="#MeatTopping"/>
    <Class IRI="#PizzaTopping"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
    <Class IRI="#SohoPizza"/>
    <Class IRI="#Pizza"/>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
    <Class IRI="#SohoPizza"/>
    <ObjectSomeValuesFrom>
        <ObjectProperty IRI="#hasTopping"/>
        <Class IRI="#VegetableTopping"/>
    </ObjectSomeValuesFrom>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
    <Class IRI="#SohoPizza"/>
    <ObjectAllValuesFrom>
        <ObjectProperty IRI="#hasTopping"/>
        <Class IRI="#VegetableTopping"/>
    </ObjectAllValuesFrom>
</SubClassOf>
<SubClassOf>
    <Class IRI="#VegetableTopping"/>
    <Class IRI="#PizzaTopping"/>
</SubClassOf>
<InverseObjectProperties>
    <ObjectProperty IRI="#hasTopping"/>
    <ObjectProperty IRI="#isToppingOf"/>
</InverseObjectProperties>
<ObjectPropertyDomain>
    <ObjectProperty IRI="#hasTopping"/>
    <Class IRI="#Pizza"/>
</ObjectPropertyDomain>
<ObjectPropertyRange>
    <ObjectProperty IRI="#hasTopping"/>
    <Class IRI="#PizzaTopping"/>
</ObjectPropertyRange>
</Ontology>
4

1 回答 1

1

此示例是标准 OWL 教程的一部分，请参见此处。显然教程有点不一致。

声明VegetableTopping是Disjoint With MeatTopping解决问题。

于 2019-02-21T14:25:35.493 回答