Per Max Kuhn 的网络书-在这里搜索method = 'glm'
,里面没有调整参数。glm
caret
我们可以通过测试一些基本train
调用来轻松验证这种情况。首先,让我们从一个方法 ( rpart
) 开始,该方法 ( ) 根据网络手册确实有一个调整参数 ( cp
)。
library(caret)
data(GermanCredit)
# Check tuning parameter via `modelLookup` (matches up with the web book)
modelLookup('rpart')
# model parameter label forReg forClass probModel
#1 rpart cp Complexity Parameter TRUE TRUE TRUE
# Observe that the `cp` parameter is tuned
set.seed(1)
model_rpart <- train(Class ~., data=GermanCredit, method='rpart')
model_rpart
#CART
#1000 samples
# 61 predictor
# 2 classes: 'Bad', 'Good'
#No pre-processing
#Resampling: Bootstrapped (25 reps)
#Summary of sample sizes: 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, ...
#Resampling results across tuning parameters:
# cp Accuracy Kappa
# 0.01555556 0.7091276 0.2398993
# 0.03000000 0.7025574 0.1950021
# 0.04444444 0.6991700 0.1316720
#Accuracy was used to select the optimal model using the largest value.
#The final value used for the model was cp = 0.01555556.
我们看到cp
参数已调整。现在让我们试试glm
。
# Check tuning parameter via `modelLookup` (shows a parameter called 'parameter')
modelLookup('glm')
# model parameter label forReg forClass probModel
#1 glm parameter parameter TRUE TRUE TRUE
# Try out the train function to see if 'parameter' gets tuned
set.seed(1)
model_glm <- train(Class ~., data=GermanCredit, method='glm')
model_glm
#Generalized Linear Model
#1000 samples
# 61 predictor
# 2 classes: 'Bad', 'Good'
#No pre-processing
#Resampling: Bootstrapped (25 reps)
#Summary of sample sizes: 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, ...
#Resampling results:
# Accuracy Kappa
# 0.7386384 0.3478527
在这种情况下,glm
没有执行参数调整。parameter
根据我的经验, named似乎parameter
只是一个占位符,而不是真正的调整参数。正如下面的代码所示,即使我们试图强制它进行调整parameter
,它基本上也只会执行一个值。
set.seed(1)
model_glm2 <- train(Class ~., data=GermanCredit, method='glm',
tuneGrid=expand.grid(parameter=c(0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1,10,100, 1000)))
model_glm2
#Generalized Linear Model
#1000 samples
# 61 predictor
# 2 classes: 'Bad', 'Good'
#No pre-processing
#Resampling: Bootstrapped (25 reps)
#Summary of sample sizes: 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, ...
#Resampling results across tuning parameters:
# Accuracy Kappa parameter
# 0.7386384 0.3478527 0.001
# 0.7386384 0.3478527 0.001
# 0.7386384 0.3478527 0.001
# 0.7386384 0.3478527 0.001
# 0.7386384 0.3478527 0.001
# 0.7386384 0.3478527 0.001
# 0.7386384 0.3478527 0.001
#Accuracy was used to select the optimal model using the largest value.
#The final value used for the model was parameter = 0.001.