18

我正在尝试使用 std::optional 但我的代码引发错误。
我已经指定#include <experimental/optional>和编译器选项是-std=c++1z, -lc++experimental。

如何使用std::experimental::optional？

以下是代码：

#include <experimental/optional>
#include <iostream>

std::experimental::optional<int> my_div(int x, int y) {
    if (y != 0) {
        int b = x / y;
        return {b};
    }
    else {
        return {};
    }
}

int main() {
    auto res = my_div(6, 2);
    if (res) {
        int p = res.value();
        std::cout << p << std::endl;
    }
}

错误信息：

optional.cpp:17:21: error: call to unavailable member function 'value': 
        int p = res.value();
                ~~~~^~~~~
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/experimental/optional:525:17: note: candidate function has been explicitly made unavailable
    value_type& value()
                ^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/experimental/optional:517:33: note: candidate function has been explicitly made unavailable
    constexpr value_type const& value() const
                                ^
1 error generated.

操作系统：macOS 10.12.5

编译器版本：

Apple LLVM version 8.1.0 (clang-802.0.42)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin16.6.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin
4

1 回答 1

24

好的，在您发布错误后，我可以调查一下（但您也可以这样做）。

简而言之

这是 Apple 在 OSX 上提供的问题/错误optional，但有一个简单的解决方法。

这是怎么回事

该文件/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/include/c++/v1/exper‌​imental/optional将违规函数声明optional::value为

template <class _Tp>
class optional
    : private __optional_storage<_Tp>
{
  /* ... */

  _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS
  constexpr value_type const& value() const
  {
    if (!this->__engaged_)
        throw bad_optional_access();
    return this->__val_;
  }

  _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS
  value_type& value()
  {
    if (!this->__engaged_)
        throw bad_optional_access();
    return this->__val_;
  }
  /* ... */
};

仅运行预处理器（编译器选项-E）显示宏扩展为

#define _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY \
  __attribute__ ((__visibility__("hidden"), __always_inline__))
#define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS \
  __attribute__((unavailable))

特别是，宏在文件中_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS为#defined/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/include/c++/v1/__config

// Define availability macros.
#if defined(_LIBCPP_USE_AVAILABILITY_APPLE)
// ...
#define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS __attribute__((unavailable))
// ...
#else
// ...
#define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS
// ...
#endif

Thus, this is a Apple specific change from LLVM's libc++ API. As the name of the macro implies, the reason is that Apple does not make 

class bad_optional_access
: public std::logic_error
{
public:
  bad_optional_access() : std::logic_error("Bad optional Access") {}
  virtual ~bad_optional_access() noexcept;
};

available and hence cannot implement functionality (optional::value) that depends on it. Why bad_optional_access is not provided (thereby breaking the standard) is unclear, but it may have to do with the fact that a library (dylib) must be altered to contain bad_optional_access::~bad_optional_access().

HOW TO WORK AROUND

simply use optional::operator* instead

int p = *res;

The only real difference is that no access check is done. If you need that, do it yourself

template<typename T>
T& get_value(std::experimental::optional<T> &opt)
{
  if(!opt.has_value())
    throw std::logic_error("bad optional access");
  return *opt;
}

template<typename T>
T const& get_value(std::experimental::optional<T>const &opt)
{
  if(!opt.has_value())
    throw std::logic_error("bad optional access");
  return *opt;
}
于 2017-05-29T13:45:44.010 回答