2

这个问题类似于之前发布的问题，How can I deep-compare 2 Lua tables，可能有也可能没有作为键的表？

问题是，那里的解决方案非常适合简单的深度比较。但是，它不能正确处理循环引用。更具体地说，如下：

function table_eq(table1, table2)
   local avoid_loops = {}
   local function recurse(t1, t2)
      -- compare value types
      if type(t1) ~= type(t2) then return false end
      -- Base case: compare simple values
      if type(t1) ~= "table" then return t1 == t2 end
      -- Now, on to tables.
      -- First, let's avoid looping forever.
      if avoid_loops[t1] then return avoid_loops[t1] == t2 end
      avoid_loops[t1] = t2
      -- Copy keys from t2
      local t2keys = {}
      local t2tablekeys = {}
      for k, _ in pairs(t2) do
         if type(k) == "table" then table.insert(t2tablekeys, k) end
         t2keys[k] = true
      end
      -- Let's iterate keys from t1
      for k1, v1 in pairs(t1) do
         local v2 = t2[k1]
         if type(k1) == "table" then
            -- if key is a table, we need to find an equivalent one.
            local ok = false
            for i, tk in ipairs(t2tablekeys) do
               if table_eq(k1, tk) and recurse(v1, t2[tk]) then
                  table.remove(t2tablekeys, i)
                  t2keys[tk] = nil
                  ok = true
                  break
               end
            end
            if not ok then return false end
         else
            -- t1 has a key which t2 doesn't have, fail.
            if v2 == nil then return false end
            t2keys[k1] = nil
            if not recurse(v1, v2) then return false end
         end
      end
      -- if t2 has a key which t1 doesn't have, fail.
      if next(t2keys) then return false end
      return true
   end
   return recurse(table1, table2)
end


local t1 = {}

t1[t1]=t1
t1.x = {[t1] = {1, 2, 3}}

local t2 = {}
local t3 = {}

t2[t3]=t2
t3[t2]=t3
t2.x = {[t3] = {1, 2, 3}}
t3.x = {[t2] = {1, 2, 3}}

print(table_eq(t1, t2))
--[[>
lua: deeptest.lua:15: stack overflow
stack traceback:
    deeptest.lua:15: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    ...
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:26: in function <deeptest.lua:3>
    (...tail calls...)
    deeptest.lua:62: in main chunk
    [C]: in ?
--]]

产生堆栈溢出。如果不是因为堆栈溢出，它可能会产生误报（不是我可以测试的）。

我该如何处理这种情况？（它甚至可以处理吗？当我想到它时，这听起来像是计算机科学中一个未解决的问题......但我对此知之甚少）

当我说“结构平等”时，我的意思是下表：

local t = {}
t[{}] = 1
t["1"] = {}

在结构上与下表不同：

local t = {}
local t2 = {}
t[t2] = 1
t["1"] = t2

而在“内容平等”中，它们是平等的。

测试用例：

local t1 = {}

t1[t1]=t1
t1.x = {[t1] = {1, 2, 3}}

local t2 = {}
local t3 = {}

t2[t3]=t2
t3[t2]=t3
t2.x = {[t3] = {1, 2, 3}}
t3.x = {[t2] = {1, 2, 3}}

assert(table_eq(t1, t2) == false)
assert(table_eq(t2, t3) == true)

local t4 = {}
t4[{}] = 1
t4["1"] = {}

local t5 = {}
local t6 = {}
t5[t6] = 1
t5["1"] = t6

assert(table_eq(t4, t5) == false)
4

1 回答 1

1

在这个例子中，堆栈溢出很容易通过改变这个来修复：

-- if key is a table, we need to find an equivalent one.
        local ok = false
        for i, tk in ipairs(t2tablekeys) do
           if table_eq(k1, tk) and recurse(v1, t2[tk]) then

至：

-- if key is a table, we need to find an equivalent one.
        local ok = false
        for i, tk in ipairs(t2tablekeys) do
           if recurse(k1, tk) and recurse(v1, t2[tk]) then

前 2 个测试用例返回 true，但第 3 个测试用例失败，因为作为键的表将内容与内容进行比较。如果要测试密钥是否与实际表相同，则需要将其更改为：

-- if key is a table, we need to find an equivalent one.
        local ok = false
        for i, tk in ipairs(t2tablekeys) do
           if k1 == tk and recurse(v1, t2[tk]) then

但是请记住，第二个测试用例将失败，因为您希望将表格作为将内容与内容进行比较的关键，而不是实际表格。

您的测试用例在您认为“平等”方面相互矛盾，因此没有真正的答案。

附言

此函数忽略元数据，这也可以与 __eq 元方法进行比较。所以无论如何它仍然不是一个完整的比较。

于 2016-09-17T15:08:55.953 回答