你如何operator<<(std::ostream &os, const ClassX &x)
从 gdb 内部调用?
换句话说,你如何在 gdb 中打印一个对象?
call std::cout<<x
或者call operator<<(std::cout, x)
似乎对我不起作用!
有任何想法吗?
你如何operator<<(std::ostream &os, const ClassX &x)
从 gdb 内部调用?
换句话说,你如何在 gdb 中打印一个对象?
call std::cout<<x
或者call operator<<(std::cout, x)
似乎对我不起作用!
有任何想法吗?
我发现的唯一方法是:
call 'operator<<(std::ostream&, myclass&)'(mycout, c)
由于由于std::cout
某种原因对 gdb 不可见,我不得不像这样创建自己的:
std::ostream mycout(std::cout.rdbuf());
您没有说明任何想要这样做的理由,但不会print yourvariable
更容易?
如果这是绝对必须的,你可以Print
在你的类中有一个方法并调用它operator<<
,然后Print
从 gdb 调用你的对象上的方法。
请注意 stdout 可能在 gdb 中缓冲,因此除非您以某种方式重定向它,否则您将看不到任何输出。
请参阅gdb 的邮件存档中有关此问题的讨论。
您还可以定义如下函数:
define printType
call operator<<(std::ostream&, const $arg0 &)(std::cerr, $arg1)
end
并像这样使用它:
printType ClassX objectOfClassX
对我来说call operator<<
运行没有错误,但没有打印。原来我需要打电话给flush
. 这是您可以放入的有用功能.gdbinit
:
define str
call (void)operator<<(std::cout, $arg0)
call (void)std::cout.flush()
printf "\n"
end
I have the following in my .gdbinit
. The previous answers here did not work for me when the operator<<
is a template or required a lot of typing to get the types right. This approach searches the symbol table to find the correct operator<<
. This only works if the operators have been instantiated explicitly.
python
import gdb
import re
class LexicalCast(gdb.Command):
def __init__(self):
super(LexicalCast, self).__init__("lexical_cast", gdb.COMMAND_DATA)
def matches(self, symbol, type, exact=True):
params = symbol.find('('), symbol.find(')')
if -1 in params: return False
params = symbol[params[0]+1 : params[1]]
if re.match("^%s, %s( const)?&?$"%(re.escape("std::ostream&"), re.escape(type)), params): return True
if not exact and re.match("^%s, .*::%s( const)?&?$"%(re.escape("std::ostream&"), re.escape(type)), params): return True
return False
def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
value = gdb.parse_and_eval(arg)
type = str(value.type.strip_typedefs().unqualified())
# isn't unqualified() supposed to do that already?
if type.startswith("const "): type = type[6:]
if type.startswith("struct "): type = type[7:]
if type.endswith(" &"): type = type[:-2]
# there's probably a better way to browse the list of symbols ...
shift_operators = gdb.execute("info functions operator<<", False, True).split('\n')
matching_operators = [ op for op in shift_operators if self.matches(op, type)]
if not matching_operators:
gdb.write("No operator<<(std::ostream&, const %s&) found in the symbols. Trying to find a match with additional namespace qualifiers.\n"%(type,))
matching_operators = [ op for op in shift_operators if self.matches(op, type, False)]
if not matching_operators:
gdb.write("No operator<<(std::ostream&, const .*::%s&) found in the symbols. Did you forget to explicitly instantiate your operator?\n"%(type,))
else:
if len(matching_operators) > 1:
gdb.write("Found multiple operator<< matching this expression; trying to call each one of them...\n")
for op in matching_operators:
try:
op = op.split(' ', 1)[1][:-4] if op.endswith("@plt") else op.split(':', 1)[1].split('&', 1)[1].strip()[:-1]
gdb.execute("call (void)'%s'((std::cout), (%s))"%(op, arg))
gdb.execute("call (void)std::cout.put('\\n')")
gdb.execute("call (void)std::cout.flush()")
break
except Exception as e:
gdb.write("Could not invoke %s: %s\n"%(op, e))
LexicalCast()
end
In GDB I use it like this:
(gdb) lex sector[0]
4: 1 ~ ([-3.00170 +/- 3.86e-6], [-1.73303 +/- 7.55e-8])
(gdb) lex 123
No operator<<(std::ostream&, const int&) found in the symbols. Did you explicitly instantiate that operator?
This is mostly a hack of course that likely breaks if you have changed how GDB prints info functions
, but it works well for my purposes.