有没有办法检查一个集合是否包含 m >= n 的预期元素列表(e_1、e_2、...、e_m)中的至少 n 个元素?我在想类似于 的东西IterableSubject.containsAnyOf(e_1, e_2, ...)
,这可以被认为是 n = 1 的特殊情况。
问问题
1276 次
1 回答
0
目前没有内置的命题google-truth
来验证 a 是否包含来自一组候选者Collection
的至少N个元素。Collection
您可以通过查看 中的可用方法来确定 a 的内置命题词汇表IterableSubject
。
由于没有内置命题,您有两个主要选项可以在 内执行您的断言google-truth
:
- 自己计算匹配项的数量并断言
isAtLeast
- 通过提供自定义
SubjectFactory
来创建您自己的匹配 N 命题assertAbout
创建自己的命题需要更多的工作,但会使您的测试更具可读性,并在测试失败时提供更好的消息。以下示例演示了这两个选项:
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
import com.google.common.truth.FailureStrategy;
import com.google.common.truth.IterableSubject;
import com.google.common.truth.SubjectFactory;
import org.junit.Test;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.stream.StreamSupport;
import static com.google.common.collect.Sets.newHashSet;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertAbout;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
public class ContainsAtLeastTest {
List<Integer> haystack = ImmutableList.of(1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3);
@Test
public void COUNT_YOURSELF_haystack_contains_at_least_two_needles() {
// No built-in way to match-N elements, so you can match yourself then compare.
// This is easier to implement initially, but doesn't look as nice and gives not-so-great failure messages.
Set<Integer> needles = ImmutableSet.of(0, 1, 2);
long theNumberOfContainedElements = haystack.stream().distinct().filter(needles::contains).count();
assertThat(theNumberOfContainedElements).isAtLeast(2L);
}
@Test
public void CUSTOM_PROPOSITION_haystack_contains_at_least_two_needles() {
// If this is something that you test often, or if you just want the test to be more readable,
// it could be worth adding your own match-N proposition.
// You can word your own propositions however you like to maximize readability.
// The assertAbout method is google-truth's hook into extending the built-in testing vocabulary.
// You can define your own propositions by providing your own Subject class
// (which is just a set of possible propositions about something) and a SubjectFactory.
assertAbout(An.<Integer>iterable()).that(haystack).hasAtLeast(2).elementsFrom(1, 3, 5);
}
// Wrapping with "An" allows specifying the Iterable's generic type in a readable way.
static class An {
// assertAbout will use our factory that returns our own Subject
static <T> SubjectFactory<ExtendedIterableSubject<T>, Iterable<T>> iterable() {
return new SubjectFactory<ExtendedIterableSubject<T>, Iterable<T>>() {
@Override
public ExtendedIterableSubject<T> getSubject(FailureStrategy fs, Iterable<T> target) {
return new ExtendedIterableSubject<>(fs, target);
}
};
}
// We extend from IterableSubject so we don't lose the built-in vocabulary
static class ExtendedIterableSubject<T> extends IterableSubject<ExtendedIterableSubject<T>, T, Iterable<T>> {
ExtendedIterableSubject(FailureStrategy failureStrategy, Iterable<T> list) {
super(failureStrategy, list);
}
// Alternatively, we could directly define a proposition hasAtLeastTwoOf(T... elements),
// but it's nicer if min is a parameter.
IterableWithMin hasAtLeast(int min) {
return new IterableWithMin(min);
}
// Don't make this inner class extend Subject, because when starting with hasAtLeast(N),
// the language of the test will only make sense if it's followed by a method defined here.
// This keeps the API fluent by limiting the vocabulary.
class IterableWithMin {
int min;
IterableWithMin(int min) {
this.min = min;
}
@SafeVarargs final void elementsFrom(T... instances) {
// The actual match-N translated into a fluent hasAtLeast(N).elementsFrom(e1, e2, ..., eM) form.
Set<T> instanceSet = newHashSet(instances);
long numContainedElements = StreamSupport.stream(getSubject().spliterator(), false).distinct().filter(instanceSet::contains).count();
if (numContainedElements < min) {
fail(String.format("contains at least %d elements from", min), Arrays.asList(instances));
}
}
}
}
}
}
于 2016-04-28T19:45:48.243 回答