I have one List box and I would like to set code type of it.
I create new AbstractCodeType :
public class MyCodeType extends AbstractCodeType<String, String> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 6808664924551155395L;
public static final String ID = null;
@Override
public String getId() {
return ID;
}
@Order(10.0)
public static class UnknownCode extends AbstractCode<String> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -1307260056726644943L;
public static final String ID = "Unknown";
@Override
protected String getConfiguredText() {
return TEXTS.get("Unknown");
}
@Override
public String getId() {
return ID;
}
}
}
and I set this code type in list box :
@Override
protected Class<? extends ICodeType<?, String>> getConfiguredCodeType() {
return MyCodeType.class;
}
But doesn't work. It return empty box.
While I was debugging I noticed that in AbstractListBox.class in initConfig method it call this code type and set code type in m_lookupCall inside setCodeTypeClass. Then inside execLoadTableData, it get call but this call return empty array when called call.getDataByAll().
I suspect that converting between code type and Lookup call does not work properly.
EDIT
I try to debug where is the problem and if follow the path :
initConfig() -> CodeLookupCall.newInstanceByService(m_codeTypeClass); (line 581)
and if you look inside CodeLookupCall ;
getDataByAll() in line 221 `resolveCodes(v)` -> BEANS.opt(m_codeTypeClass) -> bean.getInstance() -> m_producer.produce(this) -> return (T) getCache().get(createCacheKey(type));
This is in class CodeService.class in line 97 :
Class<T> type is right class and createCacheKey(type) return not null object but then getCache().get(...) return null. From this point on everything is null (what is reasonable regarding that getCodeType return null.)
This is what I found out while debugging, if it helps someone to figure out what is wrong.