以下两种缓冲方法之间有什么区别(如果有)?
Reader r1 = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(in, "UTF-8"), bufferSize);
Reader r2 = new InputStreamReader(new BufferedInputStream(in, bufferSize), "UTF-8");
以下两种缓冲方法之间有什么区别(如果有)?
Reader r1 = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(in, "UTF-8"), bufferSize);
Reader r2 = new InputStreamReader(new BufferedInputStream(in, bufferSize), "UTF-8");
r1
效率更高。它InputStreamReader
本身没有很大的缓冲区。BufferedReader
可以设置为具有比 更大的缓冲区InputStreamReader
。InputStreamReader
in将r2
成为瓶颈。
简而言之:您应该通过漏斗而不是瓶子来读取数据。
更新:这是一个小基准程序,只需复制'n'粘贴'n'运行它。您无需准备文件。
package com.stackoverflow.q3459127;
import java.io.BufferedInputStream;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.BufferedWriter;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.io.Reader;
public class Test {
public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
// Init.
int bufferSize = 10240; // 10KB.
int fileSize = 100 * 1024 * 1024; // 100MB.
File file = new File("/temp.txt");
// Create file (it's also a good JVM warmup).
System.out.print("Creating file .. ");
BufferedWriter writer = null;
try {
writer = new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter(file));
for (int i = 0; i < fileSize; i++) {
writer.write("0");
}
System.out.printf("finished, file size: %d MB.%n", file.length() / 1024 / 1024);
} finally {
if (writer != null) try { writer.close(); } catch (IOException ignore) {}
}
// Read through funnel.
System.out.print("Reading through funnel .. ");
Reader r1 = null;
try {
r1 = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(new FileInputStream(file), "UTF-8"), bufferSize);
long st = System.nanoTime();
for (int data; (data = r1.read()) > -1;);
long et = System.nanoTime();
System.out.printf("finished in %d ms.%n", (et - st) / 1000000);
} finally {
if (r1 != null) try { r1.close(); } catch (IOException ignore) {}
}
// Read through bottle.
System.out.print("Reading through bottle .. ");
Reader r2 = null;
try {
r2 = new InputStreamReader(new BufferedInputStream(new FileInputStream(file), bufferSize), "UTF-8");
long st = System.nanoTime();
for (int data; (data = r2.read()) > -1;);
long et = System.nanoTime();
System.out.printf("finished in %d ms.%n", (et - st) / 1000000);
} finally {
if (r2 != null) try { r2.close(); } catch (IOException ignore) {}
}
// Cleanup.
if (!file.delete()) System.err.printf("Oops, failed to delete %s. Cleanup yourself.%n", file.getAbsolutePath());
}
}
我的 Latitude E5500 与Seagate Momentus 7200.3硬盘的结果:
创建文件..完成,文件大小:99 MB。 通过漏斗阅读..在 1593 毫秒内完成。 通过瓶子阅读..在 7760 毫秒内完成。
r1
BufferedReader
当您将基于行的流作为支持readLine
方法阅读时也更方便。您不必将内容逐个读入 char 数组缓冲区或字符。但是,您必须为变量显式r1
转换为BufferedReader
或使用该类型。
我经常使用这个代码片段:
BufferedReader br = ...
String line;
while((line=br.readLine())!=null) {
//process line
}
针对上述评论中的罗斯·斯图特曼的问题(但也与 OP 相关):
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(new BufferedInputSream(inputStream), "UTF-8"));
这BufferedInputStream
是多余的(并且可能由于多余的复制而损害性能)。这是因为通过调用从大块中BufferedReader
请求字符,而后者又(通过)调用从底层读取大块字节。InputStreamReader
InputStreamReader.read(char[], int, int)
StreamDecoder
InputStream.read(byte[], int, int)
InputStream
您可以通过运行以下代码来说服自己:
new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(new ByteArrayInputStream("Hello world!".getBytes("UTF-8")) {
@Override
public synchronized int read() {
System.err.println("ByteArrayInputStream.read()");
return super.read();
}
@Override
public synchronized int read(byte[] b, int off, int len) {
System.err.println("ByteArrayInputStream.read(..., " + off + ", " + len + ')');
return super.read(b, off, len);
}
}, "UTF-8") {
@Override
public int read() throws IOException {
System.err.println("InputStreamReader.read()");
return super.read();
}
@Override
public int read(char[] cbuf, int offset, int length) throws IOException {
System.err.println("InputStreamReader.read(..., " + offset + ", " + length + ')');
return super.read(cbuf, offset, length);
}
}).read(); // read one character from the BufferedReader
您将看到以下输出:
InputStreamReader.read(..., 0, 8192)
ByteArrayInputStream.read(..., 0, 8192)
这表明BufferedReader
请求来自 的大块字符InputStreamReader
,而后者又从底层请求大块字节InputStream
。
FWIW,如果您在 Java 8 中打开文件,则可以使用Files.newBufferedReader(Path)。我不知道性能与此处描述的其他解决方案相比如何,但至少它推动了决定将什么构造缓冲到 JDK 中。