这是我的类型...
unit unitTestInterfaces;
interface
type
IFoo = interface
['{169AF568-4568-429A-A8F6-C69F4BBCC6F0}']
function TestFoo1:string;
function TestFoo:string;
end;
IBah = interface
['{C03E4E20-2D13-45E5-BBC6-9FDE12116F95}']
function TestBah:string;
function TestBah1:string;
end;
TFooBah = class(TInterfacedObject, IFoo, IBah)
//IFoo
function TestFoo1:string;
function TestFoo:string;
//IBah
function TestBah1:string;
function TestBah:string;
end;
implementation
{ TFooBah }
function TFooBah.TestBah: string;
begin
Result := 'TestBah';
end;
function TFooBah.TestBah1: string;
begin
Result := 'TestBah1';
end;
function TFooBah.TestFoo: string;
begin
Result := 'TestFoo';
end;
function TFooBah.TestFoo1: string;
begin
Result := 'TestFoo1';
end;
end.
这是我运行示例的代码...
var
fb:TFooBah;
f:IFoo;
b:IBah;
begin
try
fb := TFooBah.Create;
/// Notice we've used IBah here instead of IFoo, our writeln() still outputs the
/// result from the TestBah() function, presumably because it's the "first" method
/// in the IBah interface, just as TestFoo1() is the "first" method in the IFoo
/// interface.
(fb as IUnknown).QueryInterface(IBah,f); //So why bother with this way at all??
//f := fb as IBah; //causes compile error
//f := fb; //works as expected
if Assigned(f)then
begin
writeln(f.TestFoo1); //wouldn't expect this to work since "f" holds reference to IBah, which doesn't have TestFoo1()
end;
(fb as IUnknown).QueryInterface(IBah,b);
if Assigned(f) then
begin
writeln(b.TestBah1);
end;
except on E:Exception do
writeln(E.Message);
end;
end.
似乎在第一次调用 QueryInterface 时,即使我们为“f”变量分配了错误类型的接口,它仍然会尝试执行它所指向的任何东西的“第一个”方法,而不是与名称“TestFoo1”。使用 f := fb 可以按预期工作,那么我们是否有理由使用 QueryInterface 而不是语法 f := fb?