通过在上游管道完成后将counterPipe
输入类型更改为Maybe String
并注入额外的内容,我能够使其工作:Nothing
import Pipes
import Pipes.Core (respond)
import Control.Applicative ((<*))
withEOF :: (Monad m) => Proxy a' a b' b m r -> Proxy a' a b' (Maybe b) m r
withEOF p = for p (respond . Just) <* respond Nothing
counterPipe :: Pipe (Maybe String) String IO Int
counterPipe = go 0
where
go n = do
mx <- await
case mx of
Just x -> do
yield x
let n' = succ n
liftIO $ putStrLn $ "Chunk " ++ show n'
go n'
Nothing -> do
return n
finishCounter :: Int -> Pipe a b IO ()
finishCounter n = liftIO $ putStrLn $ unwords ["Finished after", show n, "chunks"]
示例驱动程序:
import qualified Pipes.Prelude as P
main = runEffect $ withEOF P.stdinLn >-> (counterPipe >>= finishCounter) >-> P.stdoutLn
我认为这种模式应该可以抽象成类似的东西
whileJust :: (Monad m) => Proxy a' a b' b m r -> Proxy a' (Maybe a) b' b m (Maybe r)
所以你可以写
withEOF P.stdinLn >-> (whileJust counterPipe >>= maybe (return ()) finishCounter) >-> P.stdoutLn
无需更改您的原始counterPipe
定义;但我以前从未使用Pipes
过(上面的解决方案是通过查看类型和玩 type-domino 来解决的),所以我没有设法写whileJust
(签名可能太通用了,我无法弄清楚) .