1

当我想到这个想法时,我正在尝试在一个项目(Play Framework 2.4)中重构我的 scala 代码:

(为了提供一个最小的工作示例,我更改了一些类,例如,我分别使用 Int 和 Option[Int] 更改了 Result 和 Future[Result])

object ParFuncApply {

  trait CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[A]
  trait AuthenticatedRequest[A] extends CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[A]
  trait UnauthenticatedRequest[A] extends CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[A]


  private def fold[T](authenticated: (AuthenticatedRequest[_]) => T)
                             (unauthenticated: (UnauthenticatedRequest[_]) => T):
  PartialFunction[CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[_], T] = {
    case ar: AuthenticatedRequest[_] => authenticated(ar)
    case ur: UnauthenticatedRequest[_] => unauthenticated(ur)
  }

  def apply(request: CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[_])
           (authenticated: (AuthenticatedRequest[_]) => Int)
           (unauthenticated: (UnauthenticatedRequest[_]) => Int): Int = {
    fold(authenticated)(unauthenticated)(request)
  }

  def async(request: CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[_])
           (authenticated: (AuthenticatedRequest[_]) => Option[Int])
           (unauthenticated: (UnauthenticatedRequest[_]) => Option[Int]): Option[Int] = {
    fold(authenticated)(unauthenticated)(request)
  }
}

上面的代码编译。

然后我想:我应该将 fold[T] 参数化类型限制为 Int 和 Option[Int],所以我添加了:

object ParFuncApply {

  trait CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[A]
  trait AuthenticatedRequest[A] extends CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[A]
  trait UnauthenticatedRequest[A] extends CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[A]

  sealed trait Helper[T]

  object Helper {
    implicit object FutureResultHelper extends Helper[Option[Int]]
    implicit object ResultHelper extends Helper[Int]
  }

  private def fold[T: Helper](authenticated: (AuthenticatedRequest[_]) => T)
                             (unauthenticated: (UnauthenticatedRequest[_]) => T):
  PartialFunction[CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[_], T] = {
    case ar: AuthenticatedRequest[_] => authenticated(ar)
    case ur: UnauthenticatedRequest[_] => unauthenticated(ur)
  }

  def apply(request: CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[_])
           (authenticated: (AuthenticatedRequest[_]) => Int)
           (unauthenticated: (UnauthenticatedRequest[_]) => Int): Int = {
    fold(authenticated)(unauthenticated)(request)
  }

  def async(request: CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[_])
           (authenticated: (AuthenticatedRequest[_]) => Option[Int])
           (unauthenticated: (UnauthenticatedRequest[_]) => Option[Int]): Option[Int] = {
    fold(authenticated)(unauthenticated)(request)
  }
}

但是这段代码不再编译,相反,如果我改变: fold(authenticated)(unauthenticated)(request)fold(authenticated)(unauthenticated).apply(request)(我已经添加了一个对apply()的显式调用)它编译。为什么会这样?在一个类上调用 () 和 .apply() 应该是一样的,不是吗?

编译器似乎要求将返回类型(Int 或 Option[Int])传递给 PartialFunction,而不是 CanBeAuthenticatedRequest 类型。

4

1 回答 1

3

因为您在 `fold[T : Helper]' 中定义了一个上下文绑定,所以编译器将添加另一个参数列表。换句话说,上下文绑定只是语法糖:

private def fold[T](authenticated: (AuthenticatedRequest[_]) => T)
                   (unauthenticated: (UnauthenticatedRequest[_]) => T)
                   (implicit helper: Helper[T): PartialFunction[CanBeAuthenticatedRequest[_], T] 

所以当你打电话时

fold(authenticated)(unauthenticated)(request)

编译器认为request应该是显式指定的隐式 Helper[T]。

于 2015-08-31T11:23:34.643 回答