1

我正在尝试使用以下方法在 Rails 中测试我的更新操作：

context "on PUT to :update" do
  setup do
    @countdown = Factory(:countdown)
    @new_countdown = Factory.stub(:countdown)
    put :update, :id => @countdown.id, :name => @new_countdown.name, :end => @new_countdown.end
  end

  should_respond_with :redirect
  should_redirect_to("the countdowns view") { countdown_url(assigns(:countdown)) }
  should_assign_to :countdown
  should_set_the_flash_to /updated/i

  should "save :countdown with new attributes" do
    @countdown = Countdown.find(@countdown.id)
    assert_equal @new_countdown.name, @countdown.name
    assert_equal 0, (@new_countdown.end - @countdown.end).to_i
  end    
end

当我实际使用构建的脚手架进行更新过程时，它会很好地更新记录，但是测试给了我这个错误：

  1) Failure:
test: on PUT to :update should save :countdown with new attributes. (CountdownsControllerTest)
[/test/functional/countdowns_controller_test.rb:86:in `__bind_1276353837_121269'
 /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/thoughtbot-shoulda-2.10.2/lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `call'
 /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/thoughtbot-shoulda-2.10.2/lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `test: on PUT to :update should save :countdown with new attributes. ']:
<"Countdown 8"> expected but was
<"Countdown 7">.
4

1 回答 1

0

我原以为那些end列会搞砸红宝石，但看起来它可能不会......？

无论如何，所以我认为这/test/functional/countdowns_controller_test.rb:86是这个断言：assert_equal @new_countdown.name, @countdown.name.

所以你的断言是问@new_countdown.name 和@countdown.name 是一样的吗？打开工厂看看，我想这是简单的答案。不确定您要在这里测试什么。

另外，为什么@countdown = Countdown.find(@countdown.id)使用相同的实例变量名？设置中的@countdown 是否与测试中查找行中的@countdown 相同？

于 2010-08-19T02:13:46.317 回答