0

简单(1:1)父/子循环引用的序列化工作,如mythz answer here中所述。但是,当尝试使用将 ref 保留给父级的子级列表来序列化父级时,我得到了 StackOverflowException。

我在 GitHub 上的 commonGib 存储库中将其浓缩为基本测试测试类。

测试:

/// <summary>
/// Trivial business classes with a simple 1:1 circular relationship, i.e. Parent.Child, Child.Parent.
/// </summary>
[TestMethod]
public void Simple_ServiceStack()
{
    var parent = new SimpleParent() { Text = "Foo" };
    var child = new SimpleChild() { Number = 2 };

    parent.Child = child;
    child.Parent = parent;

    var parentJson = JsonSerializer.SerializeToString(parent);

    var parentTest = JsonSerializer.DeserializeFromString<SimpleParent>(parentJson);

    Assert.IsTrue(parentTest.TextEqualsFoo());
    Assert.IsTrue(parentTest.Child.NumberEqualsTwo());
}

/// <summary>
/// Test business classes more complex by having a parent with a list of children, as opposed
/// to a 1:1 relationship, i.e. Parent.Children instead of Parent.Child.
/// </summary>
[TestMethod]
public void Complex_ServiceStack()
{
    var parent = new ComplexParent() { Text = "Foo" };
    var child = new ComplexChild() { Number = 2 };

    parent.Children = new List<ComplexChild>() { child };
    child.Parent = parent;

    var parentJson = JsonSerializer.SerializeToString(parent); //Throws stack overflow

    var parentTest = JsonSerializer.DeserializeFromString<ComplexParent>(parentJson);

    Assert.IsTrue(parentTest.TextEqualsFoo());
    foreach (var childTest in parentTest.Children)
    {
        Assert.IsTrue(childTest.NumberEqualsTwo());
    }
}

/// <summary>
/// Real-world business classes wrapped around a state class.
/// </summary>
[TestMethod]
public void VeryComplex_ServiceStack()
{
    var parentState = new VeryComplexParentState() { Text = "Foo" };
    var childState = new VeryComplexChildState() { Number = 2 };

    var parent = new VeryComplexParent() { State = parentState };
    var child = new VeryComplexChild() { State = childState };

    parent.Children = new List<VeryComplexChild>() { child };
    child.Parent = parent;

    var parentJson = JsonSerializer.SerializeToString(parent); //Throws stack overflow

    var parentTest = JsonSerializer.DeserializeFromString<ComplexParent>(parentJson);

    Assert.IsTrue(parentTest.TextEqualsFoo());
    foreach (var childTest in parentTest.Children)
    {
        Assert.IsTrue(childTest.NumberEqualsTwo());
    }
}

测试类:

#region Simple Parent/Child

public class SimpleParent
{
    public string Text { get; set; }
    public SimpleChild Child { get; set; }

    /// <summary>
    /// This is like a validation rule on the state wrapper.
    /// </summary>
    public bool TextEqualsFoo()
    {
        return Text == "Foo";
    }
}

public class SimpleChild
{
    public int Number { get; set; }
    public SimpleParent Parent { get; set; }

    /// <summary>
    /// This is like a validation rule on the state wrapper.
    /// </summary>
    public bool NumberEqualsTwo()
    {
        return Number == 2;
    }
}

#endregion

#region Complex Parent/Child

public class ComplexParent
{
    public string Text { get; set; }
    public List<ComplexChild> Children { get; set; }

    /// <summary>
    /// This is like a validation rule on the state wrapper.
    /// </summary>
    public bool TextEqualsFoo()
    {
        return Text == "Foo";
    }
}

public class ComplexChild
{
    public int Number { get; set; }
    public ComplexParent Parent { get; set; }

    /// <summary>
    /// This is like a validation rule on the state wrapper.
    /// </summary>
    public bool NumberEqualsTwo()
    {
        return Number == 2;
    }
}

#endregion

#region Very Complex Parent/Child

public abstract class BaseSerializationTestClass<TState>// : BaseSerializationTestClass
{
    public TState State { get; set; }
}


public class VeryComplexParent : BaseSerializationTestClass<VeryComplexParentState>
{
    /// <summary>
    /// This is like a validation rule on the state wrapper.
    /// </summary>
    public bool TextEqualsFoo()
    {
        return State != null && State.Text == "Foo";
    }

    public List<VeryComplexChild> Children { get; set; }
}

public class VeryComplexParentState
{
    public string Text { get; set; }

    public List<VeryComplexChildState> MyChildrenState { get; set; }
}

public class VeryComplexChild : BaseSerializationTestClass<VeryComplexChildState>
{
    /// <summary>
    /// This is like a validation rule on the state wrapper.
    /// </summary>
    public bool NumberEqualsTwo()
    {
        return State != null && State.Number == 2;
    }

    public VeryComplexParent Parent { get; set; }
}

public class VeryComplexChildState
{
    public int Number { get; set; }

    public VeryComplexParentState MyAState { get; set; }
}

#endregion
4

1 回答 1

1

不,循环引用不起作用。即使在您的第一个示例(Simple_ServiceStack)中,我也得到了序列化:

{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{" Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text" :"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":" Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo" ,"子":{"数字":2,"父":{"文本":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo ","子":{"数字":2,"父":{"文本":"Foo","子":{"数字":2,"父":{"文本":"Foo", "子":{"数字":2,"父":{"文本":"Foo","子":{"数字":2,"父":{"文本":"Foo","子":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child": {"数字":2,"父":{"文本":"Foo","子”:{“数字”:2,"父":{"文本":"Foo","子":{"数字":2,"父":{"文本":"Foo","子" :{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{ "Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number ":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number": 2,"父":{"文本":"Foo","子":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number" :2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2 ,"父":{"文本":"Foo","子":{"数字":2,"父":{"文本":"Foo","子":{"数字":2," Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent" :{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent" :{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{ "Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text ":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text": "Foo","子":{"数字":2,"父":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text" :"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":" Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}))}}}}} }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}})}}}}}}}}}}))}}}}}}}}} }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":}}}}}}}} }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}})}}}}}}}}}}))}}}}}}}}} }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}})}}}}}}}}})}}}}}Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":{"Text":"Foo","Child":{"Number":2,"Parent":}}}}}}}} }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}})}}}}}}}}}}))}}}}}}}}} }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}})}}}}}}}}})}}}}}

那是错误的破碎的(见最后"Parent":})。(使用ServiceStack.Text 4.0.38测试)

正如其中一条评论所写:

您的示例 dto 没有使用循环引用 - 它为每个链接属性使用不同的对象

正如您链接的问题所建议的那样,使用带有元 ID 的 Json.NET。

于 2015-04-08T14:42:34.743 回答