2

我应该放什么而不是???让代码进行类型检查?或者还有什么我应该做的吗?我正在使用 Play 为所有扩展 A(层)的 B、C、D 类生成 JSON,但尝试构建 JSON 的代码只知道它有一个 A,而不是 B、C 或 D 的子类型。

class Layer

object Layer {
  implicit val layerWrites = new Writes[Layer] {
    def writes(x: Layer) = x match {
      case a: CloudLayer         => ???
      case b: VerticalVisibility => ???
      case c: SkyClear           => ???
    }
  }
}

case class CloudLayer(coverage: String, base: Int) extends Layer
case class VerticalVisibility(height: Int)         extends Layer
case class SkyClear()                              extends Layer

object CloudLayer {
  implicit val cloudLayerWrites = new Writes[CloudLayer] {
    def writes(x: CloudLayer) = Json.obj(
      "layerType" -> "cloudLayer",
      "coverage" -> x.cloudCoverage,
      "base" -> x.base * 100
    )
  }
}

object VerticalVisibility {
  implicit val verticalVisibilityWrites = new Writes[VerticalVisibility] {
    def writes(x: VerticalVisibility) = Json.obj(
      "layerType" -> "verticalVisibility",
      "height" -> x.height * 100
    )
  }
}

object SkyClear {
  implicit val skyClearWrites = new Writes[SkyClear] {
    def writes(x: SkyClear) = Json.obj( "layerType" -> "skyClear" )
  }
}
4

1 回答 1

1

最简单的解决方案是从子类中的实例中删除implicit修饰符,然后显式引用它们:

object Layer {
  implicit val layerWrites = new Writes[Layer] {
    def writes(x: Layer) = x match {
      case a: CloudLayer         => CloudLayer.cloudLayerWrites.writes(a)
      case b: VerticalVisibility =>
        VerticalVisibility.verticalVisibilityWrites.writes(b)
      case c: SkyClear           => SkyClear.skyClearWrites.writes(c)
    }
  }
}

您也可以只废弃各个实例并将其内容移动到模式匹配中。

如果您喜欢冒险,Julien Richard-Foy 有一个非常简洁的增强版Json.writes, etc. 宏,适用于密封类型的层次结构。

于 2015-03-03T19:51:59.320 回答