2

PHP 函数是否filter_var('bob@example.com', FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL)使用标准 RFC 5322 验证电子邮件?

4

2 回答 2

4

作为正在使用的正则表达式的作者,filter_var我可以确认它没有全面使用 RFC 5322(具体来说,它不允许注释和折叠空格)。

VolkerK 链接到的文章包含更新的验证——包括更准确的 RFC 5322 实现以及 RFC 5321 的实现(我认为更合适的标准)——但filter_var尚未更新以包含改进。

于 2015-02-27T17:22:31.103 回答
2

该过滤器的实现代码中有一条注释:

void php_filter_validate_email(PHP_INPUT_FILTER_PARAM_DECL) /* {{{ */
{
    /*
     * The regex below is based on a regex by Michael Rushton.
     * However, it is not identical.  I changed it to only consider routeable
     * addresses as valid.  Michael's regex considers a@b a valid address
     * which conflicts with section 2.3.5 of RFC 5321 which states that:
     *
     *   Only resolvable, fully-qualified domain names (FQDNs) are permitted
     *   when domain names are used in SMTP.  In other words, names that can
     *   be resolved to MX RRs or address (i.e., A or AAAA) RRs (as discussed
     *   in Section 5) are permitted, as are CNAME RRs whose targets can be
     *   resolved, in turn, to MX or address RRs.  Local nicknames or
     *   unqualified names MUST NOT be used.
     *
     * This regex does not handle comments and folding whitespace.  While
     * this is technically valid in an email address, these parts aren't
     * actually part of the address itself.
     *
     * Michael's regex carries this copyright:
     *
     * Copyright © Michael Rushton 2009-10
     * http://squiloople.com/
     * Feel free to use and redistribute this code. But please keep this copyright notice.
     *
     */

并且“原始”来源很可能是:http ://squiloople.com/2009/12/20/email-address-validation/

/**
   * Validate an email address using RFC 5322
   *
...

所以,你有一个索赔和一个修复了一个所谓的错误的人
......除此之外我不知道;-)

于 2015-02-02T14:54:58.603 回答