我正在编写一些 Python 代码来并行对大量 git 存储库执行操作。为此,我尝试结合concurrent.futures和GitPython,在单独的未来任务中克隆每个存储库。这是使用 OS X 10.10 上的内置 Python 2.7.6 以及通过 pip 安装的 GitPython 0.3.5 和 futures 2.2.0(向后移植到 2.7 的版本)。
我正在使用的代码的一个简单示例如下:
import time
from concurrent import futures
import shutil
import os
from git import Repo
def wait_then_return(i):
print('called: %s', i)
time.sleep(2)
return i
def clone_then_return(i):
print('called: %s', i)
path = os.path.join('/tmp', str(i))
os.mkdir(path)
# clone some arbitrary repo
Repo.clone_from('https://github.com/ros/rosdistro', path)
shutil.rmtree(path)
return i
if __name__ == "__main__":
tasks = 20
workers = 4
with futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=workers) as executor:
# this works as expected... delaying work until a thread is available
# fs = [executor.submit(wait_then_return, i) for i in range(0, tasks)]
# this doesn't... all 20 come in quick succession
fs = [executor.submit(clone_then_return, i) for i in range(0, tasks)]
for future in futures.as_completed(fs):
print('result: %s', future.result())
当我将wait_then_return
函数提交给 executor 时,我得到了预期的行为:首先以四个为一组进行打印,然后大致沿着这些线完成,直到所有期货都完成。如果我切换它,clone_then_return
那么执行程序似乎忽略了 max_workers参数并并行运行所有 20 个期货。
这可能是什么原因?