如果您在其他地方修改tickets
给定的其中一个,是的。Customer
你为什么不测试这个?让我们假设Cutomer#1
has Ticket#1
andTicket#2
在它的tickets
集合中。我运行了这段代码:
// loading in first session
Session session1 = HibernateUtil.getSession();
Transaction tx1 = session1.beginTransaction();
Customer c1 = (Customer) session1.load(Customer.class, 1L); // loads from db and puts in cache
for (Ticket ticket : c1.getTickets()) { // caches q2742145.Customer.tickets#1
System.out.println(ticket);
}
Ticket ticket = (Ticket) session1.load(Ticket.class, 1L); // doesn't hit the db
ticket.setName("foo"); // do some change on Ticket#1
session1.save(ticket);
tx1.commit(); // Ticket#1 gets updated in the db and the cached association invalidated
// loading in second session
Session session2 = HibernateUtil.getSession();
Transaction tx2 = session2.beginTransaction();
Customer c2 = (Customer) session2.load(Customer.class, 1L); // hits the cache
Set<Ticket> tickets = c2.getTickets();
for (Ticket ticket2 : tickets) { // reloads tickets from db
System.out.println(ticket2);
}
tx2.commit();
这表明票的集合得到“刷新”。