这失败了:
my @a = ("a", "b", "c", "d", "e");
my %h = map { "prefix-$_" => 1 } @a;
出现此错误:
Not enough arguments for map at foo.pl line 4, near "} @a"
但这有效:
my @a = ("a", "b", "c", "d", "e");
my %h = map { "prefix-" . $_ => 1 } @a;
为什么?
因为 Perl 猜测的是 EXPR(例如哈希引用)而不是 BLOCK。这应该有效(注意“+”符号):
my @a = ("a", "b", "c", "d", "e");
my %h = map { +"prefix-$_" => 1 } @a;
我更喜欢把它写成
my %h = map { ("prefix-$_" => 1) } @a;
为了显示意图,我将返回一个 2 元素列表。
来自perldoc -f map
:
"{" starts both hash references and blocks, so "map { ..."
could be either the start of map BLOCK LIST or map EXPR, LIST.
Because perl doesn’t look ahead for the closing "}" it has to
take a guess at which its dealing with based what it finds just
after the "{". Usually it gets it right, but if it doesn’t it
won’t realize something is wrong until it gets to the "}" and
encounters the missing (or unexpected) comma. The syntax error
will be reported close to the "}" but you’ll need to change
something near the "{" such as using a unary "+" to give perl
some help:
%hash = map { "\L$_", 1 } @array # perl guesses EXPR. wrong
%hash = map { +"\L$_", 1 } @array # perl guesses BLOCK. right
%hash = map { ("\L$_", 1) } @array # this also works
%hash = map { lc($_), 1 } @array # as does this.
%hash = map +( lc($_), 1 ), @array # this is EXPR and works!
%hash = map ( lc($_), 1 ), @array # evaluates to (1, @array)
or to force an anon hash constructor use "+{"
@hashes = map +{ lc($_), 1 }, @array # EXPR, so needs , at end
and you get list of anonymous hashes each with only 1 entry.
另外,做你正在做的事情的另一种方法是初始化哈希,你可以这样做:
my @a = qw( a b c d e );
my %h;
@h{@a} = ();
这将为五个键中的每一个创建 undef 条目。如果您想为它们提供所有真实值,请执行此操作。
@h{@a} = (1) x @a;
您也可以使用循环显式执行此操作;
@h{$_} = 1 for @a;
我觉得
map { ; "prefix-$_" => 1 } @a;
就指定它是语句块而不是哈希引用而言,它更惯用。你只是用一个空语句开始它。