我有一个原型,它有一个可以添加回调的方法:
/*
* Add a callback function that is invoked on every element submitted and must return a data object.
* May be used as well for transmitting static data.
*
* The callback function is supposed to expect a jQuery element as single parameter
* and must return a data object (for additional data to be sent along with the one already given upon initialization).
* Adding multiple callback functions results in those functions being invoked in the same order as they were added.
*
* 1) Therefore subsequent assignments to the same key in the data array override those that were performed by a previous callback function.
* 2) If data_arg = true is given, the data returned by the callback function that was previously called is given to the new_callback as 2nd argument, so it can be manipulated.
* However, even if it isn't, the unchanged data must be returned anyway to have any effect.
*/
this.add_data_callback = function(new_callback, data_arg) {
if(this.data_callback) {
old_callback = this.data_callback;
if(!data_arg) {
//alert('add it');
//alert(old_callback);
//alert(new_callback);
this.data_callback = function(element) {
//alert('do it');
//alert(old_callback);
//alert(new_callback);
return jQuery.extend(old_callback(element), new_callback(element));
};
}
else {
this.data_callback = function(element, data) {
return new_callback(element, old_callback(element));
};
}
}
else {
//alert('add the first');
//alert(new_callback);
this.data_callback = new_callback;
}
};
(请忽略 data_arg = true 的 else 部分,因为它不相关。)
在我的具体情况下,我添加了三个回调函数。但是,如果最终为元素调用 this.data_callback() ,则会导致整个事物无限循环。在我试图追踪错误的过程中,上面的警报(是的,我知道有调试工具,但这样更舒服)对问题提供了以下见解:
- 匿名函数/闭包(包含 jQuery.extend() 的那个)被调用。new_callback 包含第三个回调函数。old_callback 包含另一个...
- 被调用的匿名函数。new_callback 包含第二个回调函数。old_callback 应该包含第一个回调函数,但实际上它是另一个......
- 被调用的匿名回调。new_callback 再次包含第二个回调函数。old_callback 包含匿名函数
- ...
现在,我想念什么?是一些奇怪的关闭魔法还是只是一些我显然看不到的明显错误?
提前致谢!