我正在使用 MATALB 进行并行计算parfor
。代码结构看起来很像
%%% assess fitness %%%
% save communication overheads
bitmaps = pop(1, new_indi_idices);
porosities = pop(2, new_indi_idices);
mid_fitnesses = zeros(1, numel(new_indi_idices));
right_fitnesses = zeros(1, numel(new_indi_idices));
% parallelization starts
parfor idx = 1:numel(new_indi_idices) % only assess the necessary
bitmap = bitmaps{idx};
if porosities{idx}>POROSITY_MIN && porosities{idx}<POROSITY_MAX
[mid_dsp, right_dsp] = compute_displacement(bitmap, ['1/' num2str(PIX_NO_PER_SIDE)]);
mid_fitness = 100+mid_dsp;
right_fitness = 100+right_dsp;
else % porosity not even qualified
mid_fitness = 0;
right_fitness = 0;
end
mid_fitnesses(idx) = mid_fitness;
right_fitnesses(idx) = right_fitness;
fprintf('Done.\n');
pause(0.01); % for break
end
我遇到了以下奇怪的错误。
Error using parallel.internal.pool.deserialize (line 9)
Bad version or endian-key
Error in distcomp.remoteparfor/getCompleteIntervals (line 141)
origErr =
parallel.internal.pool.deserialize(intervalError);
Error in nsga2 (line 57)
parfor idx = 1:numel(new_indi_idices) % only assess the necessary
我应该如何解决它?快速的谷歌搜索没有返回任何解决方案。
更新 1
更奇怪的是,以下代码片段在完全相同的设置和相同的 HPC 下完美运行。我认为它们两者之间可能存在一些细微的差异,导致一个工作而另一个失败。工作片段:
%%% assess fitness %%%
% save communication overheads
bitmaps = pop(1, new_indi_idices);
porosities = pop(2, new_indi_idices);
fitnesses = zeros(1, numel(new_indi_idices));
% parallelization starts
parfor idx = 1:numel(new_indi_idices) % only assess the necessary
bitmap = bitmaps{idx};
if porosities{idx}>POROSITY_MIN && porosities{idx}<POROSITY_MAX
displacement = compute_displacement(bitmap, ['1/' num2str(PIX_NO_PER_SIDE)]);
fitness = 100+displacement;
else % porosity not even qualified
fitness = 0;
end
fitnesses(idx) = fitness;
%fprintf('Done.\n', gen, idx);
pause(0.01); % for break
end
pop(3, new_indi_idices) = num2cell(fitnesses);
更新 2
怀疑会给[mid_dsp, right_dsp] = compute_displacement(bitmap, ['1/' num2str(PIX_NO_PER_SIDE)]);
我带来麻烦,我将其替换为
mid_dsp = rand();
right_dsp = rand();
然后,它起作用了!这证明这确实是由这条特定的线路引起的。但是,我确实测试了该函数,它正确返回了两个数字!由于函数返回值一样rand()
,我看不出有任何区别。这让我更加困惑。