0

反序列化时是否有可能跳过序列化流的下一个“条目”？关于面向插件的架构，序列化对象图的不同部分可能会在另一个环境中成为未知类型（假设它们可以被安全地忽略）。试图反序列化这些当然会失败。

abstract class Thing{}
class OneThing : Thing {}  // <-- known in environment A & B
class SomeThing : Thing {} // <-- only known in environment A
...
var things = new List<Thing>();
...
things.Add(  (OneThing)(formatter.Deserialize(stream)) );
things.Add( (SomeThing)(formatter.Deserialize(stream)) ); // <-- skip in B
things.Add(  (OneThing)(formatter.Deserialize(stream)) );

如何使它与二进制格式化程序一起使用？我是否必须计算长度并检索序列化条目的明确类型名称（例如字符串）并将其存储在条目本身之前，以便在反序列化时跳过它（通过增加流指针）？或者是否有更好的选择，对序列化表示的特定问题操作较少？

4

3 回答 3

1

BinaryFormatter是一个基于类型的序列化器。坦率地说，如果类型未知（并且已知是相同的，包括程序集/身份），那么首先使用它是一个非常糟糕的主意BinaryFormatter。大多数序列化程序如果无法理解数据就会窒息，而没有真正提供出色的“跳过”选项。我知道 protobuf-net确实允许对这种类型的场景进行简单的恢复，但是 protobuf-net 想要提前知道子类型，这并不能使其非常适用于插件场景。

于 2014-04-16T10:07:45.273 回答
0

我尝试了通过增加指针简单地跳过流部分的版本，这起到了作用。目前这对我有用（尽管它可能不是最好的解决方案）：

interface ISerializableObject { }

class PluginSerialization
{
    private readonly IFormatter formatter;

    public PluginSerialization(IFormatter f)
    {
        formatter = f;
    }

    public void SerializeToStream(IEnumerable<ISerializableObject> components, Stream s)
    {
        foreach (var component in components)
        {
            using (var cStream = new MemoryStream())
            {
                formatter.Serialize(cStream, component);
                cStream.Flush();

                // write to stream [length] [type as string] [object]
                formatter.Serialize(s, cStream.Length);
                formatter.Serialize(s, component.GetType().ToString());
                cStream.WriteTo(s);
            }
        }
    }

    public List<ISerializableObject> DeserializeFromStream(Stream s, Func<string, bool> isKnownType )
    {
        var components = new List<ISerializableObject>();

        while (s.Position < s.Length - 1)
        {
            var length = (long)(formatter.Deserialize(s));
            var name = (string)(formatter.Deserialize(s));

            // skip unknown types
            if (!isKnownType(name))
            {
                s.Position += length;
                continue;
            }

            components.Add((ISerializableObject) (formatter.Deserialize(s)));                
        }

        return components;
    }
}

这允许对不同对象列表的部分反序列化 ( List<ISerializableObject>())。但是，存储数据的方式和顺序（长度、类型名称、对象）是一个特定的实现细节，因此应该尽可能地封装。

于 2014-04-16T11:07:47.480 回答
0

我有类似的问题，我想我找到了解决方案。

        using (FileStream fs = new FileStream(filePath, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read))
        {
            BinaryFormatter bfmt = new BinaryFormatter()
            {
                SurrogateSelector = new NonSerializableSurrogateSelector(),
                Binder = new IgnoreUnknownTypesBinder()
            };

            dict1 = (Dictionary<string, object>)bfmt.Deserialize(fs);
            dict2 = (Dictionary<string, string>)bfmt.Deserialize(fs);

        }

和帮助类代码

/// <summary>
/// Returns NullSurrogate for all types not marked Serializable
/// </summary>
public class NonSerializableSurrogateSelector : ISurrogateSelector
{
    public void ChainSelector(ISurrogateSelector selector)
    {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }

    public ISurrogateSelector GetNextSelector()
    {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }

    public ISerializationSurrogate GetSurrogate(
      Type type, StreamingContext context, out ISurrogateSelector selector)
    {
        if (!type.IsSerializable)
        {
            //type not marked Serializable
            selector = this;
            return new NullSurrogate();
        }
        // use default surrogate
        selector = null;
        return null;
    }
}

public class NullSurrogate : ISerializationSurrogate
{
    public void GetObjectData(object obj, SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context)
    {
    }

    public object SetObjectData(object obj, SerializationInfo info, StreamingContext context,
                                ISurrogateSelector selector)
    {
        return null;
    }
}

public class IgnoreUnknownTypesBinder : SerializationBinder
{
    public override Type BindToType(string assemblyName, string typeName)
    {
        try
        {
            var assembly = Assembly.Load(assemblyName);
            var type = assembly.GetType(typeName);
            return type;
        }
        catch
        {
            return typeof(IgnoreUnknownTypesBinder); // here could be any non-serializable class
        }
    }
}
于 2017-06-21T13:24:20.743 回答