understand
通过发布您的代码的 1/100,我们并不是您想要的!
但是,请检查以下部分以进行澄清。请,从下一次开始,尝试将整个代码放在这里。它是免费的。:-)
情况1
代码
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int if_nan(double a)
{
return a!=a;
}
int main()
{
double p;
int result;
p = 3.5;
result = if_nan(p);
printf("\n\nresult is %d\n\n", result);
return 0;
}
输出/输出
[sourav@localhost ~]$ gcc -g so_test3.c -o test
[sourav@localhost ~]$ valgrind --leak-check=full ./test
==24217== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==24217== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==24217== Using Valgrind-3.5.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==24217== Command: ./test
==24217==
result is 0
==24217==
==24217== HEAP SUMMARY:
==24217== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==24217== total heap usage: 0 allocs, 0 frees, 0 bytes allocated
==24217==
==24217== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==24217==
==24217== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==24217== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 12 from 8)
[sourav@localhost ~]$
案例2
代码
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int if_nan(double a)
{
return a!=a;
}
int main()
{
double p;
int result;
//p = 3.5;
result = if_nan(p);
printf("\n\nresult is %d\n\n", result);
return 0;
}
输出/输出
[sourav@localhost ~]$ gcc -g so_test3.c -o test
[sourav@localhost ~]$ valgrind --leak-check=full ./test
==24229== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==24229== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==24229== Using Valgrind-3.5.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==24229== Command: ./test
==24229==
==24229== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
==24229== at 0x830C3B: _itoa_word (in /lib/libc-2.5.so)
==24229== by 0x8343D0: vfprintf (in /lib/libc-2.5.so)
==24229== by 0x83BE82: printf (in /lib/libc-2.5.so)
==24229== by 0x80483DF: main (so_test3.c:17)
==24229==
==24229== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==24229== at 0x830C43: _itoa_word (in /lib/libc-2.5.so)
==24229== by 0x8343D0: vfprintf (in /lib/libc-2.5.so)
==24229== by 0x83BE82: printf (in /lib/libc-2.5.so)
==24229== by 0x80483DF: main (so_test3.c:17)
==24229==
==24229== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==24229== at 0x8327A0: vfprintf (in /lib/libc-2.5.so)
==24229== by 0x83BE82: printf (in /lib/libc-2.5.so)
==24229== by 0x80483DF: main (so_test3.c:17)
==24229==
result is 0
==24229==
==24229== HEAP SUMMARY:
==24229== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==24229== total heap usage: 0 allocs, 0 frees, 0 bytes allocated
==24229==
==24229== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==24229==
==24229== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==24229== Use --track-origins=yes to see where uninitialised values come from
==24229== ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 12 from 8)
[sourav@localhost ~]$
看起来很熟悉?:-) [别往心里放]