1

我正在努力了解我的内存泄漏来自哪里。我有一个我在研究时遇到的帖子的修改版本。我们使用 StructureMap，我们想为 MiniProfiler 使用 AOP，所以这似乎是一个完美的尝试，但是当我实现它时，我开始出现大量内存泄漏。我将泄漏追踪到创建代理的位置。如果我让所有其他代码保持不变并删除.EnrichWith(...)调用，内存泄漏就会消失。我在 Bootstrapper 类中创建代理类，如下所示：

x.For<IServiceInterface>()
 .Use<ServiceClass>()
 .EnrichWith(ex => DynamicProxyHelper.
     CreateInterfaceProxyWithTargetInterface(typeof(IServiceInterface), ex));

动态代理助手类：

public class DynamicProxyHelper
{
    public static IEnumerable<Type> GetScannableTypes()
    {
        var types = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetTypes();
        var scannableTypes = new List<Type>();
        foreach (var type in types)
        {
            // http://www.hanselman.com/blog/DoesATypeImplementAnInterface.aspx
            if (typeof (IAttributeScanTask).IsAssignableFrom(type)
                && type.FullName != typeof (IAttributeScanTask).FullName)
            {
                scannableTypes.Add(type);
            }
        }

        return scannableTypes;
    }

    public static object CreateInterfaceProxyWithTargetInterface<T>(Type interfaceType, T obj) 
    {
        if (!interfaceType.IsInstanceOfType(obj))
        {
            throw new ArgumentException(
                "DynamicProxyHelper: Object passed to the proxy must inherit from the interface type passed to the proxy.");
        }

        // Create the proxy and return the result
        var dynamicProxy = new ProxyGenerator();
        var scannableTypes = GetScannableTypes();

        var result = dynamicProxy.CreateInterfaceProxyWithTargetInterface(
            interfaceType,
            obj,
            new IInterceptor[] { new MyInterceptor(obj.GetType(), new AttributeScanEngine(), scannableTypes)} );

        return result;
    }
}

和 MyInterceptor 类：

public interface IMyInterceptor : IInterceptor {}
public class MyInterceptor : IMyInterceptor
{
    private readonly Type _concreteType;
    private readonly IAttributeScanEngine _scanEngine;
    private readonly IEnumerable<Type> _scannableTypes;
    private const string AttributeNameSpace = "MyAttributes";


    public MyInterceptor() : this(typeof(object), new AttributeScanEngine(), new List<Type>()){}

    public MyInterceptor(Type concreteType, IAttributeScanEngine scanEngine, IEnumerable<Type> scannableTypes)
    {
        _concreteType = concreteType;
        _scanEngine = scanEngine;
        _scannableTypes = scannableTypes;
    }

    public void Intercept(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        var scanType = ResolveScanType(invocation);

        // We found a matching attribute that can be applied
        if (scanType != null)
        {
            // execute the custom task we need to run
            _scanEngine.Run(invocation, scanType, _concreteType);
        }
        else
        {
            // no scanned types could be found so execute the method as is
            invocation.Proceed();
        }

    }

    protected internal virtual Type ResolveScanType(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        foreach (var type in _scannableTypes)
        {
            var attributeName = GetAttributeName(type.Name);
            var attributeType = Type.GetType(attributeName);
            if (attributeType != null)
            {
                var attributeDecoration = Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(invocation.GetConcreteMethodInvocationTarget(), attributeType, true);

                // We found an attribute for this scan type
                if (attributeDecoration != null)
                {
                    return type;
                }
            }
        }

        return null;
    }

    protected internal virtual string GetAttributeName(string typeName)
    {
        var aspectName = typeName.Substring(0, typeName.IndexOf("ScanTask"));
        return AttributeNameSpace + "." + aspectName + "Attribute";
    }         
}

我相信这与通过调用创建代理有关，EnrichWith因为如果我将代码的所有其他部分保持不变并简单地删除该调用，内存泄漏就会消失。我在这里做错了什么基本的事情吗？

4

2 回答 2

3

如果您查看这个类似的问题，您会发现他们提倡使用单例ProxyGenerator实例，以便它重用动态生成的类型。在里面DynamicProxyHelper尝试添加private static readonly ProxyGenerator dynamicProxy = new ProxyGenerator();和引用它，而不是每次都更新它。

于 2014-05-02T13:08:07.997 回答
0

我也在使用 Structuremap 和 Castle.Proxy，但方式有点不同。因此，虽然这不是内存泄漏问题的直接答案，但也许它可以为您提供另一种观点。

背后的想法是，我们将返回一个 promise对象，而不是返回请求的wrapper对象。此外，我们正在使用 setter 注入，这确实证明了不仅构造函数注入是有效的概念。首先，有一个调用自定义Convention对象的Structuremap的配置：

x.Scan(s =>
{
    s.Convention<ProxyConvention>();
    s.WithDefaultConventions();
}
..
x.SetAllProperties(.. // configure setter injeciton

代理约定确实注入了 Wrapper，作为实现：

[CLSCompliant(false)]
public class ProxyConvention : DefaultConventionScanner
{
    public override void Process(Type type, Registry registry)
    {
        var interfacesToHandle = type.GetInterfaces()
             .Where(i => i... // select what which interface should be mapped

        foreach (var inter in interfacesToHandle)
        {
            var setting = registry
                .For(inter)
                .HybridHttpOrThreadLocalScoped();
                .Use(new ProxyInstance(type)); // here we go to inject wrapper
     ...

所以，现在，我们已经使用ProxInstance对象为我们的接口注入了实现。有内容：

public ProxyInstance(Type type)
{
    ConcreteType = type; // the type for our Wrapper, the real implementation
}
protected override object build(Type pluginType, BuildSession session)
{
    var aopFilters = 
         // my custom way how to inject more AOP filters
         AopFilterManager.GetFilters()
         // the core for us, one of the interceptors is our Wrapper
        .Union(new[] { new Wrapper(ConcreteType) })
        .ToArray();

    // Castle will emit a proxy for us, but the Wrapper will do the job
    var proxy = Factory
         .CreateClassProxy(ConcreteType, AopFilterManager.AopOptions, aopFilters);

    return proxy;
}

正如我们所看到的，此时，我们确实创建了一个带有 Castle 的代理，并用Interceptors. 对象，Wrapper负责实例化真实对象，仅在它第一次被触摸的那一刻。因此，循环引用不是问题，事实上它们是受欢迎的：

public class Wrapper : IInterceptor
{
    object _lazy;
    protected readonly Type Type;

    public Wrapper(Type type)
    {
        Type = type;
    }

    public void Intercept(IInvocation invocation)
    {
        if (_lazy.IsNull()) // lazily instantiate the instance
        {
            _lazy = ObjectFactory.GetInstance(Type);
        }
        try
        {
            var method = invocation.Method;
            if (method.ContainsGenericParameters)
            {
                method = method.MakeGenericMethod(invocation.GenericArguments);
            }
            invocation.ReturnValue = method.Invoke(_lazy, invocation.Arguments);
        }
        catch (TargetInvocationException ex)
        {
            // PublishingManager.Publish(.... // publish exception
            throw;
        }
    }
}

我的类似答案可以在这里找到StructureMap - Circular Dependencies and Lazy Initialization of Setter Properties
（有 VS 2012 的Catharsis 指南，创建解决方案，您可以在其中看到它的实际效果）

于 2013-10-25T02:38:04.217 回答