5

假设我在 Ruby 中有一个看起来像这样的哈希:

{ :ie0 => "Hi",    :ex0 => "Hey",       :eg0 => "Howdy", 
  :ie1 => "Hello", :ex1 => "Greetings", :eg1 => "Good day"}

有什么好方法可以把它变成类似的东西:

{ "0" => 
    { 
        "ie" => "Hi", "ex" => "Hey", "eg" => "Howdy"
    },
  "1" => 
    {
        "ie" => "Hello", "ex" => "Greetings", "eg" => "Good day"
    }
}
4

5 回答 5

3

您要求一个好的方法来做到这一点,所以答案是:您或同事可以在六个月后理解和维护的方法。

首先,您需要一个具有自动激活功能的哈希,因为您正在创建一个嵌套的哈希结构。这是一个非常有用的编码模式,它将简化您的应用程序代码:

# Copied & pasted from the question
old_hash = { :ie0 => "Hi", :ex0 => "Hey", :eg0 => "Howdy", :ie1 => "Hello", :ex1 => "Greetings", :eg1 => "Good day"}

# Auto-vivify
new_hash = Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = { } }

然后,您可以以这种简单的方式遍历现有的键,分解每个键的部分,并使用它们将值保存在新的哈希中:

old_hash.each_pair do |key, value|
  key =~ /^(..)(.)$/               # Make a regex group for each string to parse
  new_hash[$2][$1] = value         # The regex groups become the new hash keys
end

puts new_hash

我得到这个输出:

{"0"=>{"ie"=>"Hi", "ex"=>"Hey", "eg"=>"Howdy"}, "1"=>{"ie"=>"Hello", "ex"=>"Greetings", "eg"=>"Good day"}}
于 2013-10-05T04:55:01.297 回答
3

它不漂亮,但这有效:

input = { :ie0 => "Hi",    :ex0 => "Hey",       :eg0 => "Howdy",
          :ie1 => "Hello", :ex1 => "Greetings", :eg1 => "Good day"}

output = input.inject({}) do |result, item|
  item[0] =~ /(?<key>[^\d]+)(?<index>\d+)/
  key, index = $1, $2
  value = item[1]

  result[index] ||= {}
  result[index].merge! { key => value }
  result
end

puts output
于 2013-10-05T03:18:42.327 回答
2
require 'awesome_print'

hsh = {
           :ie0 => "Hi",
           :ex0 => "Hey",
           :eg0 => "Howdy",
           :ie1 => "Hello",
           :ex1 => "Greetings",
           :eg1 => "Good day"
      }

new_hsh = hsh.each_with_object(Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = { } }) do |(k,v),h|
       h[k[-1]].merge!({k[0..-2] => v})
end
ap new_hsh

输出(用 格式化awesome_print

{
    "0" => {
        "ie" => "Hi",
        "ex" => "Hey",
        "eg" => "Howdy"
    },
    "1" => {
        "ie" => "Hello",
        "ex" => "Greetings",
        "eg" => "Good day"
    }
}
于 2013-10-05T05:18:46.803 回答
1

编辑:向赞成者道歉,我现在宁愿放弃这个答案(但不是我自己会反对它)。我会让它留在这里,因为它的历史意义(当然还有 10 分)。在它的许多缺点中,它只允许结果中的单个数字键。我提交了另一个我更喜欢的解决方案。

h = {ie0: "Hi", ex0: "Hey", eg0: "Howdy", ie1: "Hello", ex1: "Greetings", eg1: "Good day"}

n = h.keys.map {|k| k.to_s[0..-2]}.uniq.size # => 3

Hash[*h.to_a.each_slice(n).to_a.map {|s| [s.first.first.to_s[-1], Hash[*s.map {|v| [v.first.to_s[0..-2], v.last]}.flatten]]}.flatten]
于 2013-10-05T04:36:25.153 回答
0

这是一种使用@Mason 的建议(在对问题的评论中)的方法来使用group_by.

h = {ie0: "Hi", ex0: "Hey", eg0: "Howdy", ie999: "Hello", ex999: "Greetings", eg999: "Good day"}

编辑:新的和改进的(?):

p Hash[h.group_by {|e| e[0][/\d+/]}.map {|k,v| [k, Hash[v.map {|a| [a.first.to_s[/[^\d]+/], a.last]}]]}]

以前我有:

hh = h.group_by { |e| e[0][/\d+/] }
hh.each_key {|k| hh[k] = Hash[*[hh[k].map {|v| [v.first.to_s[/[^\d]+/], v.last]}].flatten]}

欢迎提出建议。我发现这是一个有趣的问题,并且喜欢阅读其他答案,我发现这些答案多种多样且具有创新性。

于 2013-10-05T07:32:00.103 回答