The issue is one of implementation. Let's say it was possible. Then std::function
would have to declare (in the case of printf)
int operator()(char* fmt, ...)
When called, it would then have to pass the contents of ... to whatever object you assigned. The issue is that it doesn't know enough about the arguments to know HOW to pass that down, which is an issue. printf() parses the format, but others use other mechanisms (an 'end' value is popular).
For the printf family of functions, I suggest you look at the vXXX versions (e.g. vprintf). Since they use well defined arguments (the last one being the variable argument list), it would be possible to bind std::function
to those versions.
Edit:
What you can do, however, is write your own wrapper that uses the vprintf
functions, and handles the vararg-> va_list conversion.
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdarg>
#include <functional>
class PrintWrapper
{
public:
PrintWrapper() = default;
template<typename T>
PrintWrapper( T&& t) : func(std::forward<T>(t))
{
}
int operator()(char const* format, ...)
{
va_list args;
va_start(args, format);
int result = func(format, args);
va_end(args);
return result;
}
private:
std::function< int(char const*, va_list)> func;
};
int main()
{
// Note, you have to use the 'v' versions
PrintWrapper p = std::vprintf;
p("%d %d %s\n", 1,2, "hello");
char buffer[256];
using namespace std::placeholders;
p = std::bind(std::vsnprintf, buffer, sizeof(buffer), _1, _2 );
p("%lf %s\n", 0.1234, "goodbye");
// Since the previous step was a wrapper around snprintf, we need to print
// the buffer it wrote into
printf("%s\n", buffer);
return 0;
}
http://ideone.com/Sc95ch