Briefly, no.
Java only works with references for objects. What you're describing relies on the low-level control on memory allocation/usage permitting you to allocate a block of memory for 'n' entries. Java simply doesn't work like that - you never have control of the memory and the JVM is at liberty to move the objects within memory. You only ever deal with references.
Note also that objects containing references will refer to further distinct memory blocks, and so the concept of an object being contained within one contiguous memory block doesn't really exist here.
If you really want a byte array backed by memory, the DirectByteBuffer may be of use. It's a java.nio
class built using the sun.misc.Unsafe
class. Perhaps you could serialise/deserialise objects to it (calculating carefully the size in order to determine the indexing properly). But the serialisation cost would swamp any other saving, I would suspect.