0

当我使用MSDN 中的示例时

var queryA = from num in numberList.AsParallel()
             select ExpensiveFunction(num); //good for PLINQ

var queryB = from num in numberList.AsParallel()
             where num % 2 > 0
             select num; //not as good for PLINQ

我的示例程序:

static void Main(string[] args)
{
   // ThreadPool.SetMinThreads(100, 100);

        var numberList = new List<int>();
        for (int i = 0; i <= 1000; i++)
        {
            numberList.Add(i);
        }
        Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
        sw.Start();
        var queryA = from num in numberList
                     select ExpensiveFunction(num); //good for PLINQ
        var c = queryA.ToList<int>();
        sw.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine(sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
        sw.Reset();
        sw.Start();
        var queryB = from num in numberList.AsParallel()
                     select ExpensiveFunction(num); //good for PLINQ
        c = queryB.ToList<int>();
        sw.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine(sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
        Console.ReadKey();
}

static int ExpensiveFunction(int a)
{
    a = a + 100 - 9 + 0 + 98;
    // Console.WriteLine(a);
    return a;
}

结果是:

7
41

为什么使用AsParallel()比不使用慢?

4

1 回答 1

2

对于计算机而言,您ExpensiveFunction确实不是昂贵的功能。

简单的数学运算可以非常快地完成。

也许尝试一下Thread.Sleep(500);。这将告诉 CPU 暂停半秒,这将模拟实际昂贵函数的效果。

编辑- 我应该说,它变慢的原因是因为并行处理涉及的开销比实际计算更多。请参阅此答案以获得更好的解释

于 2013-06-28T14:42:32.463 回答