这里我做了一个简单的测试来检查堆栈上的元素是否可以被删除。
// This program test whether an object is dynamically allocated and passed as a parameter to a function , \
//free()ed in that function , then would it really get free()ed or still existing
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
typedef struct node
{
int data ;
struct node *next;
} node ;
void deleteElement(int *p)
{
free(p);
}
void deleteNode(node *node)
{
free(node);
}
int main()
{
int i = 10 ;
int *p = &i ;
node *parent = (node *)malloc(sizeof(node));
parent->data = 10;
node *child = (node *)malloc(sizeof(node));
parent->next = child ;
deleteElement(p);
printf("\np : %d",*p);
deleteNode(parent);
printf("\nparent node: %d",parent->data);
printf("\nchild node : %d",child->data);
return 0 ;
}
但我收到以下错误
codejack@ubuntu:~/Code::Blocks/ProgrammingTests$ ./a.out
*** glibc detected *** ./a.out: free(): invalid pointer: 0x00007fff9e9fa284 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x7eb96)[0x7f34da65cb96]
./a.out[0x4005c4]
./a.out[0x400635]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed)[0x7f34da5ff76d]
./a.out[0x4004c9]
======= Memory map: ========
00400000-00401000 r-xp 00000000 07:00 383254 /home/codejack/Code::Blocks/ProgrammingTests/a.out
00600000-00601000 r--p 00000000 07:00 383254 /home/codejack/Code::Blocks/ProgrammingTests/a.out
00601000-00602000 rw-p 00001000 07:00 383254 /home/codejack/Code::Blocks/ProgrammingTests/a.out
0190a000-0192b000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap]
7f34da3c8000-7f34da3dd000 r-xp 00000000 07:00 197806 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
7f34da3dd000-7f34da5dc000 ---p 00015000 07:00 197806 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
7f34da5dc000-7f34da5dd000 r--p 00014000 07:00 197806 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
7f34da5dd000-7f34da5de000 rw-p 00015000 07:00 197806 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
7f34da5de000-7f34da793000 r-xp 00000000 07:00 700468 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
7f34da793000-7f34da992000 ---p 001b5000 07:00 700468 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
7f34da992000-7f34da996000 r--p 001b4000 07:00 700468 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
7f34da996000-7f34da998000 rw-p 001b8000 07:00 700468 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
7f34da998000-7f34da99d000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
7f34da99d000-7f34da9bf000 r-xp 00000000 07:00 700456 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
7f34daba5000-7f34daba8000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
7f34dabbc000-7f34dabbf000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0
7f34dabbf000-7f34dabc0000 r--p 00022000 07:00 700456 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
7f34dabc0000-7f34dabc2000 rw-p 00023000 07:00 700456 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
7fff9e9db000-7fff9e9fc000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack]
7fff9e9ff000-7fff9ea00000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso]
ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vsyscall]
Aborted (core dumped)
实际上我在实现删除树时被卡住了。我使用删除了叶节点free()
,现在父节点将成为叶节点,并使用递归删除这些节点。但问题是叶节点实际上并没有被删除,它仍然存在。而且我在删除树时遵循的方法如下
void deleteTree(struct node *root)
{
if(root->left == NULL && root->right == NULL)
{
free(root);
}
else
{
if(root->left != NULL)
deleteTree(root->left);
if(root->right != NULL)
deleteTree(root->right);
}
}
该方法只删除了叶子节点,并没有删除相应的父节点。在 XCode 中调试后,我发现叶子节点没有被删除,它们仍然存在。 那么为什么这个方法在我做的测试中显示任何错误???